1977
DOI: 10.1071/ph770209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Molonglo Deep Sky Survey of Radio Sources. I. Declination Zone -20°

Abstract: Results of a deep survey made at 408 MHz with the Molonglo cross are given. The catalogue lists positions and flux densities for a total of 373 radio sources, most of which have not previously been catalogued, in a solid angle of 0·0201 Sf. This covers (with some excluded areas) right ascensions 0l h oom-06 h 44m and 13 h 45 m -17 h 19 m , with a range in declination of 41'. Eighteen contour maps are given of sources that are extended or have very close companions. A thorough error analysis is given, as well a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confusion for the MDS2 is therefore [(11.5) 2 -(6.11) 2 ]2 = 9.7±0.4mJy. This estimate is in excellent agreement with 10.9± 1.3 mJy found by Robertson (1977a) from the MDS1. As noted by Robertson (1977a), the confusion in Molonglo data is probably equally proportioned between contributions due to weak sources and sidelobes.…”
Section: (Iii) In Flux Densitysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Confusion for the MDS2 is therefore [(11.5) 2 -(6.11) 2 ]2 = 9.7±0.4mJy. This estimate is in excellent agreement with 10.9± 1.3 mJy found by Robertson (1977a) from the MDS1. As noted by Robertson (1977a), the confusion in Molonglo data is probably equally proportioned between contributions due to weak sources and sidelobes.…”
Section: (Iii) In Flux Densitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This estimate is in excellent agreement with 10.9± 1.3 mJy found by Robertson (1977a) from the MDS1. As noted by Robertson (1977a), the confusion in Molonglo data is probably equally proportioned between contributions due to weak sources and sidelobes. As the confusion estimate for the MDS2 is about twice the noise estimate, the survey is effectively confusion limited and the addition of further Molonglo observations would achieve very little in terms of signal-to-noise.…”
Section: (Iii) In Flux Densitysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper draws attention to the sensitivity of the VI V m statistic to various parameters and illustrates these using a complete sample of QSOs from the first Molonglo deep survey (MDS1, Robertson 1977). Spectral data is reported in White, Murdoch and Hunstead (1980) and White (1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%