2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-019-00893-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Multidimensional Youth Body Dysmorphic Inventory: Development and Preliminary Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AAI has been found to have excellent convergent validity with other measures of BDD in both adult and adolescents community samples (Roberts et al, 2018;2019). In the present study, the internal reliability for this measure was excellent (α = .92).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The AAI has been found to have excellent convergent validity with other measures of BDD in both adult and adolescents community samples (Roberts et al, 2018;2019). In the present study, the internal reliability for this measure was excellent (α = .92).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The BDD-YBOCS-A has many strengths but can be lengthy to administer, and self-report measures may be a helpful alternative and/or additional assessment method. A number of self-report questionnaires have been developed to assess BDD symptoms, but only a few have been evaluated in young people specifically, namely the Body Image Questionnaire -Child and Adolescent version (BIQ-C) (Schneider, Baillie, Mond, Turner, & Hudson, 2018) (Monzani et al, 2022;Roberts et al, 2018Roberts et al, , 2019Schneider et al, 2018). The BIQ-C and MY BODI both capture distress and impairment associated with BDD and are therefore useful screening tools and outcome measures, whereas the AAI assesses specific cognitive and behavioural processes maintaining BDD and is therefore a helpful process measure that can guide psychological therapy.…”
Section: Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adult version reports 100% sensitivity and 89% specificity in individuals with a psychiatric diagnosis [23]. Further, in Australian youth the BDDQ-A has demonstrated acceptable reliability (α = .75) [24], and in those reporting high levels of BDD symptoms, known-groups validity [25].…”
Section: Diagnostic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%