2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr05046h
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nanotipped hairs of gecko skin and biotemplated replicas impair and/or kill pathogenic bacteria with high efficiency

Abstract: We show that gecko microspinules (hairs) and their equivalent replicas, bearing nanoscale tips, can kill or impair surface associating oral pathogenic bacteria with high efficiency even after 7 days of repeated attacks. Scanning Electron Microscopy suggests that there is more than one mechanism contributing to cell death which appears to be related to the scaling of the bacteria type with the hair arrays and accessibility to the underlying nano-topography of the hierarchical surfaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
95
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many micrometer-and nanometer-scale topographic patterns with varying shape and size have been shown to inhibit biofilm formation compared to flat surfaces of the same material [29,34]. It was concluded by Perera et al that microtopographic surface patterns represent a promising approach to inhibit bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, since they found protruding and receding squares, circles, and parallel channels on their material provoked a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion relative to the smooth control samples [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many micrometer-and nanometer-scale topographic patterns with varying shape and size have been shown to inhibit biofilm formation compared to flat surfaces of the same material [29,34]. It was concluded by Perera et al that microtopographic surface patterns represent a promising approach to inhibit bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, since they found protruding and receding squares, circles, and parallel channels on their material provoked a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion relative to the smooth control samples [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study [11] used a hot HF solution to 100 • C could remove zirconia surface grains unevenly instead of a uniform disposal of the surface layer, such that a surface with holes and pits of various sizes, exposed with sharp and spiky surface (Figure 2) as revealed in this study, could be formed. This type of uneven surface may inhibit bacteria attachment, since bacteria ranged in size from 0.2 to 5 µm and these various sizes of holes and pits may not allow a favorable environment for bacteria attachment [36], needless to say the sharp spiky surfaces could shred the bacteria, which would have a certain physical anti-bacteria effect [34]. Therefore, the special surface topography of the zirconia surfaces in Group HF and Group GBHF may have a negative effect on bacteria attachment and inhibit biofilm formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,22,[24][25][26]31,32,[34][35][36]38,[53][54][55][56][57] While the precise mechanism responsible for the antibacterial activity is still the subject of debate, 32,58 the consensus between the results obtained from both experimental [22][23][24][25][26]31,32,38,59,60 and theoretical 32,33 studies suggest that a torsional force is induced across the bacterial membrane upon surface adsorption.…”
Section: Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller, more-rigid, spherical S. aureus cells have a higher probability of attaching in these non-lethal regions than the larger P. aeruginosa cells. These multi-directional, bimodal nanostructures may exhibit a greater biocidal activity than that of the more regular nanostructures previously investigated, including both naturally occuring 23,25,26,32,[34][35][36][53][54][55] and synthetic 24,27,33,37,48,49,54,57,65 surfaces. This occurs because the bacteria are subjected to forces operating in multiple directions during surface adsorption, which limits their ability to evade critical membrane damage, and hence cell death.…”
Section: Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental evidence has demonstrated an opposite trend, in which the bactericidal activity increases as the nanoscale protrusions become sharper and taller 16 . Similarly, regarding a shear-stress mechanism linked to cell motility, experiments have shown that bactericidal nanotopograhies can also damage the membrane in microorganisms that lack any propulsion machinery 12,20 . Furthermore, and despite their promising functionality, up to now naturally occurring bactericidal topographies like those in the dragonfly and cicada wings have been mimicked on materials like poly(methylmethacrylate) 21 , titanium 19 , diamond 22 , and silicon 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%