2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13073723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature of Global Green Finance Standards—Evolution, Differences, and Three Models

Abstract: (1) Background: Green finance standards have proliferated with much need for harmonization to accelerate global green financial flows. However, little is known on the nature of green finance standards that accelerates differentiation, rather than harmonization. Therefore, we embark to answer the question what the nature of green finance standards is and specifically how green finance standards have evolved in major economic systems driven by different actors and leading to differences and commonalities over ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have been recently conducted in the field of GF worldwide [1,3,12,16,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], and these studies are mostly centered on GF for sustainable economic development [23][24][25]31,32]; the impact of GF on Fintech [26]; GF trends and opportunities [3,16,22,28]; the environmental effect of GF reform and innovations [17,29]; GF development and sustainability [1,27,33,34]; GF standards and green bonds [21,30]; and GF and sustainable development [12,[35][36][37]. Besides this, a few studies have tried to identify the relationship between GF and the green economy [7,38]; GF, carbon intensity, and non-fossil energy consumption, as well as climate change mitigation in the context of N11, BRICS countries, and China [39,40]; and sustainability performance [19,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been recently conducted in the field of GF worldwide [1,3,12,16,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], and these studies are mostly centered on GF for sustainable economic development [23][24][25]31,32]; the impact of GF on Fintech [26]; GF trends and opportunities [3,16,22,28]; the environmental effect of GF reform and innovations [17,29]; GF development and sustainability [1,27,33,34]; GF standards and green bonds [21,30]; and GF and sustainable development [12,[35][36][37]. Besides this, a few studies have tried to identify the relationship between GF and the green economy [7,38]; GF, carbon intensity, and non-fossil energy consumption, as well as climate change mitigation in the context of N11, BRICS countries, and China [39,40]; and sustainability performance [19,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to Fan et al [53], the following methods are selected for robustness test in Table 3: (1) e possible influence of control policies, that is, the influence that endogenous factors of the policy selection sample. For example, policies in low-carbon pilot areas may lead to a high level of green finance development in one region, so the impact of green finance development on carbon emissions is more likely to come from low-carbon pilot areas.…”
Section: Robustness Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 20th century, the rapid economic development of Western countries has brought serious environmental problems; especially after the outbreak of the "London Smog" and the "Love Canal Incident" in the United States, industrial pollution, climate change, and other issues have attracted widespread attention around the world [1]. Environmental quality may be affected by financial development, on the one hand, because financial development increases goods, intermediation, and financial services, which can promote higher energy demand and lead to increased pollution, therefore, its impact on economic growth and energy consumption exacerbates environmental pressures [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such policies do not just include regulations regarding property rights but also standards such as "green" taxonomies. Standardization measures are expected to increase transparency and facilitate the creation and functioning of markets and financial instruments [44]. This is expected to make markets work more effectively for environmental goals [45].…”
Section: Market-making Neoliberal Green Finance and Green Monetary Policymentioning
confidence: 99%