The neuro/PsyGRID calibration experiment

Abstract

Calibration experiments precede multicenter trials to identify potential sources of variance and bias. In support of future imaging studies of mental health disorders and their treatment, the Neuro/PsyGRID consortium commissioned a calibration experiment to acquire functional and structural MRI from twelve healthy volunteers attending five centers on two occasions. Measures were derived of task activation from a working memory paradigm, fractal scaling (Hurst exponent) from resting fMRI, and grey matter distributions from T(1) -weighted sequences. At each intracerebral voxel a fixed-effects analysis of variance estimated components of variance corresponding to factors of center, subject, occasion, and within-occasion order, and interactions of center-by-occasion, subject-by-occasion, and center-by-subject, the latter (since there is no intervention) a surrogate of the expected variance of the treatment effect standard error across centers. A rank order test of between-center differences was indicative of crossover or noncrossover subject-by-center interactions. In general, factors of center, subject and error variance constituted>90% of the total variance, whereas occasion, order, and all interactions were generally <5%. Subject was the primary source of variance (70%-80%) for grey-matter, with error variance the dominant component for fMRI-derived measures. Spatially, variance was broadly homogenous with the exception of fractal scaling measures which delineated white matter, related to the flip angle of the EPI sequence. Maps of P values for the associated F-tests were also derived. Rank tests were highly significant indicating the order of measures across centers was preserved. In summary, center effects should be modeled at the voxel-level using existing and long-standing statistical recommendations.

Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation

“…The level of inter-site comparability is still controversial for conventional MRI data. Some studies demonstrated systematic inter-site differences in structural T1-weighted images, which biased morphometric analyses (Focke et al, 2011), whereas other studies argued that typical pathology-related differences can be detected reliably by, for example, adjusting for potential inter-site differences (Pardoe et al, 2008; Stonnington et al, 2008; Suckling et al, 2012). …”

On the brain structure heterogeneity of autism: Parsing out acquisition site effects with significance‐weighted principal component analysis

“…A simpler approach such as applying a voxel‐by‐voxel ANOVA would also be useful to reduce the acquisition site effects [Suckling et al, 2012]. However, SWPCA is a multivariate approach that still offers major advantages over this voxel‐wise algorithm, and similar algorithms have found utility in text document searches [Kriegel et al, 2008; Tavoli et al, 2013; Zhang and Nguyen, 2005].…”

Minocycline for negative symptoms of schizophrenia and possible mechanistic actions: the BeneMin RCT

“…The study built on the demonstrated proof of concept of the efficacy of minocycline on negative symptoms in two placebo-controlled clinical trials 24,25 in patients on stable APD treatment. Minocycline also lessened weight gain in both RCTs and was well tolerated, with a good safety profile.…”

“…The chief investigator and research manager at the University of Manchester managed the trial. The academic centres had previously collaborated in the PsyGrid and NeuroPsyGrid consortia, 25 which included four of the six imaging centres that had produced harmonised procedures through their involvement with the NeuroPsyGrid consortium. The sample size was derived from recruitment rates and PANSS scores from the PsyGrid study.…”