2016
DOI: 10.3390/socsci5040066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Eugenics: Black Hyper-Incarceration and Human Abatement

Abstract: In the early twentieth century, the eugenics movement exercised considerable influence over domestic US public policy. Positive eugenics encouraged the reproduction of "fit" human specimens while negative eugenics attempted to reduce the reproduction of "unfit" specimens like the "feebleminded" and the criminal. Although eugenics became a taboo concept after World War II, it did not disappear. It was merely repackaged. Incarceration is no longer related to stated eugenic goals, yet incapacitation in prisons st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A eugenics style policy might be one explanation. A prison sentence of 25 years to life would generally mean that if the person is released, he would no longer be biologically able to have children" [45]. Viewing eugenics as an intentional feature of prisons and sentencing puts into stark relief the racial bias in sentencing and the over-policing of Black and Brown communities.…”
Section: Right To Have Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A eugenics style policy might be one explanation. A prison sentence of 25 years to life would generally mean that if the person is released, he would no longer be biologically able to have children" [45]. Viewing eugenics as an intentional feature of prisons and sentencing puts into stark relief the racial bias in sentencing and the over-policing of Black and Brown communities.…”
Section: Right To Have Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%