2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.1489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New T Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Results of a Prospective Multicentric Clinical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when we regrouped the T classifications as two groups (T1+T2+T3 vs. T4), the HRs of 8 th editions (HR = 3.070, 95%CI = 1.813-5.197, P=0.001) between adjacent T stages were smaller than in the 7th editions (HR = 5.085, 95% CI = 1.846-14.008, P=0.002). Consequently, our previous study had suggested that the T classifications should be subdivided into two stages rather than four stages [ 11 , 12 ]. Since our current study shows that there is no statistical difference between adjacent T stages using the 8 th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system, the T classification using the 8 th edition remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, when we regrouped the T classifications as two groups (T1+T2+T3 vs. T4), the HRs of 8 th editions (HR = 3.070, 95%CI = 1.813-5.197, P=0.001) between adjacent T stages were smaller than in the 7th editions (HR = 5.085, 95% CI = 1.846-14.008, P=0.002). Consequently, our previous study had suggested that the T classifications should be subdivided into two stages rather than four stages [ 11 , 12 ]. Since our current study shows that there is no statistical difference between adjacent T stages using the 8 th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system, the T classification using the 8 th edition remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All targets were treated once daily and 5 times weekly, for a total fraction of 30-33 Gy. The details of the IMRT treatment were reported in our previous studies [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have showed that the invasions in the nasal cavity, pharynx oralis, parapharyngeal space, medial pterygoid, lateral pterygoid, infratemporal fossa, paranasal sinuses, orbit, intracalvarium, and cranial nerves are all in-dependent prognostic factors [ 13 , 14 ]. According to the risk difference and survival curve distribution analyses, it is suggested that the new clinical T staging standards for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on MRI and IMRT should include: T1, nasopharynx, pharynx, oropharynx, nasal cavity, skull base, and medial pterygoid; and T2, lateral pterygoid, cavernous sinus, paranasal sinuses, infratemporal fossa, orbit, intracalvarium, and cranial nerves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new T staging criteria included [ 13 , 14 ]: T1, invasion in nasopharynx, parapharyngeal space, oropharynx, nasal cavity, skull base, and medial pterygoid; and T2, invasion in lateral pterygoid, paranasal sinuses, orbit, intracalvarium, infratemporal fossa, and cranial nerves. On the other hand, the new N staging criteria were as follows [ 15 ]: N0, with no lymph node metastasis; N1, lymph node metastasis in the VIIa region and/or unilateral upper cervical region (I, II, III, and Va regions); N2, lymph node metastasis in the bilateral upper cervical regions (I, II, III, and Va regions); and N3, lymph node metastasis in the IVa and Vb regions, as well as the lower regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation