2004
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.015024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NICE guidelines for the management of head injury: the view from a district hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of NICE guidance is to maximise the quality and consistency of patient care, but this document has been criticised because the evidence base for many of the other recommendations is limited and from non-UK settings 24. Resource availability was also outside their terms of reference,25 prompting calls for a ‘more realistic’ alternative taking this into account 26…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of NICE guidance is to maximise the quality and consistency of patient care, but this document has been criticised because the evidence base for many of the other recommendations is limited and from non-UK settings 24. Resource availability was also outside their terms of reference,25 prompting calls for a ‘more realistic’ alternative taking this into account 26…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it appears that, taking all costs into account, the CT strategy is actually one-third less expensive than that of inhospital observation [17]. Despite this, at present, radiology departments throughout the UK are not sufficiently well resourced to cope with the CT strategy as advocated by NICE [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a result of national guidance [2], the number of computed tomography (CT) of the brain performed in patients with minor head injury has increased significantly [3][4][5]. The impact of this upon anaesthetic services is not known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%