2006
DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.26893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-uniformity correction factor for the cylindrical ionization chambers in dosimetry of an HDR192Ir brachytherapy source

Abstract: The aim of this study is to derive the non-uniformity correction factor for the two therapy ionization chambers for the dose measurement near the brachytherapy source. The two ionization chambers of 0.6 cc and 0.1 cc volume were used. The measurement in air was performed for distances between 0.8 cm and 20 cm from the source in specially designed measurement jig. The non-uniformity correction factors were derived from the measured values. The experimentally derived factors were compared with the theoretically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed explanation about measurement jig and experimental procedure has been revealed in the publication. [ 27 ] The dimensions of water phantom were about 50 × 50 × 45 cm 3 , and the walls were made of acrylic. The jig was designed in such a way that it could be easily placed from air into water phantom (or vice versa) without any displacement of the chamber and the source applicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detailed explanation about measurement jig and experimental procedure has been revealed in the publication. [ 27 ] The dimensions of water phantom were about 50 × 50 × 45 cm 3 , and the walls were made of acrylic. The jig was designed in such a way that it could be easily placed from air into water phantom (or vice versa) without any displacement of the chamber and the source applicator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of nonuniformity correction factors ( N n ) used were 1.107, 1.033, 1.006 and 1.0044 for the source-to-chamber distances of 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 and 8.0 cm, respectively. [ 27 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%