1994
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90103-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The novel selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (+)-WAY-100135 aggravates dystonic movements in a mutant hamster model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rats depleted of serotoninergic neurons show no abnormality of baseline movement (14). Yet the genetically dystonic rat has diminished motor responses that involve serotoninergic systems and increased sensitivity to 5-HT 1A serotoninergic agonists (15), and the genetically dystonic hamster is dramatically worsened by 5-HT 1A antagonists (16). In humans, the serotonin syndrome is becoming increasingly recognized in patients taking drugs that increase synaptic serotonin or stimulate serotonin receptors (17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats depleted of serotoninergic neurons show no abnormality of baseline movement (14). Yet the genetically dystonic rat has diminished motor responses that involve serotoninergic systems and increased sensitivity to 5-HT 1A serotoninergic agonists (15), and the genetically dystonic hamster is dramatically worsened by 5-HT 1A antagonists (16). In humans, the serotonin syndrome is becoming increasingly recognized in patients taking drugs that increase synaptic serotonin or stimulate serotonin receptors (17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second person who had prepared the solutions, observed the animals for behavioural effects. The side effects were not quantified, but locomotor activity and ataxia were determined according to a score system, as described previously (Löscher and Richter, 1994). Animals which differed in their individual maximum dystonic stage by more than two scores between pre‐drug and post‐drug controls were omitted from evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%