1969
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1969.1099196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
0
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
175
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the EM algorithm is applied to dual estimation in a linear system, the E-step is an optimal smoother such as forward-backward smoothing [8]. The M-step yields new parameter settings that can be computed from summary statistics of the E-step distributions [19], [20].…”
Section: B Simulated Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the EM algorithm is applied to dual estimation in a linear system, the E-step is an optimal smoother such as forward-backward smoothing [8]. The M-step yields new parameter settings that can be computed from summary statistics of the E-step distributions [19], [20].…”
Section: B Simulated Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, all state distributions are approximated as multivariate Gaussians. In linear systems, the E-step then amounts to an optimal smoother such as the forward-backward smoother [8]. In the nonlinear case, taking a first-order approximation results in an EKFS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a target can generate a number of measurements in each step, the set of measurements associated with the target is denoted 50) where N j = |Y j | is the number of measurements associated with the target at time step j and y i j is the ith associated measurement at time step j. The measurements are assumed to be generated by independent and identically distributed processes.…”
Section: Extended Target Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interest in the smoothing problem was caused by the Mayne-Fraser twofilter formula [5,6], on which topic a large number of papers have been written [7][8][9][12][13][14][15][16][17] . In some of these papers the authors have encountered difficulties in motivating this formula, and the many attempts to justify it stochastically have, in our opinion , been less than convincing~ In our stochastic realization setting the two filters have a natural interpretation :…”
Section: Such a Representation Is Called A Stochastic Realization Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where x~ and x~ are given by Fraser two-filter f ormuZ-a [5,6], which has received considerable attention in the literature [7][8][9][13][14][15][16][17] . Although this algorithm is easy to derive formally [9], its probabilistic justification has caused considerable difficulty, partly due to the fact that Q*(t) as t -~ T. The system (3.20) has usually been interpreted as a backward filter , and in [14][15][16][17] [14 , 15 , 17], in which papers the back ward estima te…”
Section: ~(mentioning
confidence: 99%