2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2897911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The P&L Attribution Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first FRTB studies is that of Thompson, Luo, and Fergusson (2016, 2017) who examine the theoretical failure rate of the PLA tests (based on the January 2016 specification). Subsequently, Farag (2017) argues that alignment between front office pricing models and middle office risk models will be key to passing the PLA tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first FRTB studies is that of Thompson, Luo, and Fergusson (2016, 2017) who examine the theoretical failure rate of the PLA tests (based on the January 2016 specification). Subsequently, Farag (2017) argues that alignment between front office pricing models and middle office risk models will be key to passing the PLA tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%