2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1755048315000632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradoxical Religiosity Effect: Religion and Politics in Indonesia and the United States—ERRATUM

Abstract: We argue that personal religiosity and political religiosity are distinct attributes of a political candidate. Personal religiosity reflects a candidate's level of personal religious commitment and political religiosity reflects the candidate's policy regarding separating versus blending religion and politics. The paradoxical religiosity hypothesis predicts that, within a democracy, personal religiosity will increase voters' endorsement of a candidate whereas political religiosity will decrease voters' endorse… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles