2016
DOI: 10.1177/1035304616659984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The part-time wage penalty: Does bargaining coverage outweigh regional differences in Spain?

Abstract: Abstract:The use of part-time jobs is steadily increasing in most advanced economies. Previous literature has concluded that part-time workers suffer a wage penalty, but its magnitude varies across studies and countries. The part-time penalty is the otherwise unexplained element of the gap between full-time and part-time hourly earnings. One potential factor accounting for international differences in this penalty is the coverage of collective bargaining. This article outlines research examining wage differenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simón et al (2008a, b), De la Rica et al (2010) and Murillo Huertas and Simón Pérez (2014) focus on gender differences, finding that there is clear wage discrimination against women. Ramos et al (2016) and Simón et al (2017) investigate the wage gap between part and full-time workers by gender on average and across the distribution respectively. They conclude that the part-time wage penalty for both genders is almost fully explained by their relative characteristics on average.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simón et al (2008a, b), De la Rica et al (2010) and Murillo Huertas and Simón Pérez (2014) focus on gender differences, finding that there is clear wage discrimination against women. Ramos et al (2016) and Simón et al (2017) investigate the wage gap between part and full-time workers by gender on average and across the distribution respectively. They conclude that the part-time wage penalty for both genders is almost fully explained by their relative characteristics on average.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%