2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The peculiar small-scale X-ray morphology of NGC 5846 observed with $\vec{Chandra}$

Abstract: Abstract. The excellent quality of the Chandra observation of NGC 5846 reveals a complex X-ray morphology of the central regions of this galaxy. An intriguing morphological similarity between the X-ray and the optical line emission, discovered before using ROSAT HRI images (Trinchieri et al. 1997), is confirmed here in unprecedented detail. Complex spectral characteristics are associated with the morphological peculiarities, indicating a possibly turbulent gas in this object. A population of ∼40 individual sou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They detected, however, a large amount of individual, compact sources in the luminosity range from 3 to 20× 10 38 erg s −1 . Filho et al (2004) reanalysed the data already presented in Trinchieri & Goudfrooij (2002) and reported a weak, hard (2-10 keV) nuclear source with Γ = 2.29, which is compatible within the errors with the value we obtain from the spectral fitting. Satyapal et al (2005) analysed the Chandra data of this galaxy that they classed within Non-AGN LINERs, fitting its spectrum with a single thermal model with kT = 0.65 keV, exactly the same as in GM+06 for our single RS model.…”
Section: Ngc 5846 (Ugc 9706)supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They detected, however, a large amount of individual, compact sources in the luminosity range from 3 to 20× 10 38 erg s −1 . Filho et al (2004) reanalysed the data already presented in Trinchieri & Goudfrooij (2002) and reported a weak, hard (2-10 keV) nuclear source with Γ = 2.29, which is compatible within the errors with the value we obtain from the spectral fitting. Satyapal et al (2005) analysed the Chandra data of this galaxy that they classed within Non-AGN LINERs, fitting its spectrum with a single thermal model with kT = 0.65 keV, exactly the same as in GM+06 for our single RS model.…”
Section: Ngc 5846 (Ugc 9706)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…F.12 the two galaxies closest to it are the two small ones to the W (NGC 5845, at cz = 1458 km s −1 ) and NGC 5839, at 1225 km s −1 ); the barred spiral to the E is NGC 5850, at 2556 km s −1 , and hence it does not conform a close interacting pair. Based on Chandra data, Trinchieri & Goudfrooij (2002) revealed a complex X-ray morphology with no clear nuclear identification (see also Fig. C.70).…”
Section: Ngc 5846 (Ugc 9706)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner region of the galaxy contains dust and a radio core (Moellenhoff et al 1992). Ho et al (1997) classified this galaxy as an ambiguous case like transient 2.0 objects but the revision made by González-Martín et al (2009b) Filho et al (2004), Satyapal et al (2005), and Trinchieri & Goudfrooij (2002). Three different models were fitted (PL, APEC, and MEPL), and an order-of-magnitude difference in luminosity was found between Filho et al (2004) (log L(2−10 keV) = 38.4) and the other two works (39.4 and 39.6 + − 0.4, respectively), maybe entirely due to the different models used.…”
Section: Appendix A: Notes and Comparisons With Previous Results For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the central region of NGC 5846, a prominent dust shell has been found (Goudfrooij & Trinchieri 1998). In contrast to the X-ray faint galaxy NGC 4365, NGC 5846 shows a complex X-ray morphology, coupled with an equally peculiar energy distribution of the X-ray photons (Trinchieri & Goudfrooij 2002).…”
Section: Galaxies In (Sub-)groups: Ngc 4365 and Ngc 5846mentioning
confidence: 97%