2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-011-0425-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance Analysis of the Multicast Extension Support for Proxy MIPv6

Abstract: Mobile multicast is based on the traditional multicast protocols and the mobility support protocols to provide the multicast services for the mobile subscribers. Several mobile multicast methods were proposed in the past few years, but most of them are based on Mobile IPv6 and its variants which require the mobile node to support the mobility function. Recently, Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) was proposed to provide the mobility support for the mobile node with or without mobility function, and the previous studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the multicast session based on IP and port will break, and the multicast service will be disrupted. To solve this problem, lots of research work are based on mobility support protocols such as MIPv6 and PMIPv6 to support mobile multicast [ 64 , 65 ]. However, these mobility support protocols are designed for unicast communication, and direct adoption may introduce additional delivery cost and make mobile multicast inefficient.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the multicast session based on IP and port will break, and the multicast service will be disrupted. To solve this problem, lots of research work are based on mobility support protocols such as MIPv6 and PMIPv6 to support mobile multicast [ 64 , 65 ]. However, these mobility support protocols are designed for unicast communication, and direct adoption may introduce additional delivery cost and make mobile multicast inefficient.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicast sender mobility Host-based [8,[17][18][19][20][21][22]] Network-based [5,15,23] receiver mobility problem. Therefore, we mainly focus on the schemes for the multicast sender mobility support.…”
Section: Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], two PMIPv6 multicast methods, called the LMAbased (local mobility anchor-based) method and MAGbased (mobile access gateway-based) method, are proposed. However, our experiments verify the infeasibility of the two methods.…”
Section: Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are still larger defects in both of the mechanisms, such as the triangle routing and tunnel convergence problem [29] in the MIP-BT and higher handover latency and 'outof-synch' problem [10] in the MIP-RS. Therefore, huge time and energy are invested to study the mobile multicast issues and then a variety of solutions, such as mobile multicast (MoM) [11] and range-based mobile multicast Network-based [25][26][27][28] [26], this paper [6] a MRM, multicast receiver mobility; b MSM, multicast source mobility. http://jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2013/1/152 (RBMoM) [12], have been proposed to improve the overall performance, which focus on the defects existed in the two basic algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26], two PMIPv6 multicast methods are proposed, called the MAG-based method and local mobility anchor (LMA)-based method. However, these two methods are not very good in terms of the feasibility through the validation of our experiments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%