2019 4th Technology Innovation Management and Engineering Science International Conference (TIMES-iCON) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/times-icon47539.2019.9024634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance Evaluation of a Website using Automated Evaluation Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected websites were then labelled as follows: One appropriate automated evaluation tool which is SEOptimer was carefully selected to evaluate the websites' quality. SEOptimer is a website SEO checker which audits the website's Performance, Usability, SEO, Social media, and Security to highlight problems and provide recommendations to improve the potential of a website (Kwangsawad et al, 2019). Kwangsawad et al (2019) in their study, suggest using the SEOptimer tool as it provides full audit report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected websites were then labelled as follows: One appropriate automated evaluation tool which is SEOptimer was carefully selected to evaluate the websites' quality. SEOptimer is a website SEO checker which audits the website's Performance, Usability, SEO, Social media, and Security to highlight problems and provide recommendations to improve the potential of a website (Kwangsawad et al, 2019). Kwangsawad et al (2019) in their study, suggest using the SEOptimer tool as it provides full audit report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, most of the studies conducted evaluate websites based on the criteria, aspects or parameters suggested by the chosen automated evaluation tools. Kwangsawad et al (2019) conducted a study on a herbal cosmetic website by using three different automated evaluation tools, i.e., SEOptimer, Website Grader, and Qualidator. The overall score calculated by SEOptimer tool is 70.4%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed method also combines addressing the needs of foreign English users through the Nielsen Heuristic based questionnaire survey. In summation Accessibility on desktop websites and usability of English language website on a desktop platform overlap in some major areas whist covering the overall performance of websites as well increasing the visibility of the website (Kwangsawad, Jattamart, & Nusawat, 2019).…”
Section: Mixed Methods Of Accessibility and English Foreign User Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grade conversion was adapted from Berkeley (2020), A+ = 4.3 and F− = 1.3 as shown in Table 1. According to Kwangsawad et al (2019), SEOptimer covered various website quality aspects more than other automated evaluation tools i.e. Website grader and Qualidator, except for accessibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%