2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.10.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PETTICOAT Technique for Complicated Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Using a Tapered Self-Expanding Nitinol Device as Distal Uncovered Stent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this issue, several groups have placed distal bare metal stents to encourage false lumen thrombosis and cessation of flow. This technique, known as the Proximal ExTension to Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT) concept, has shown good initial results, but early complications and mixed results limit its widespread acceptance and use [6][7][8][9][10]. Unfortunately, there are limited remodeling data in the literature with current-generation endografts [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue, several groups have placed distal bare metal stents to encourage false lumen thrombosis and cessation of flow. This technique, known as the Proximal ExTension to Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT) concept, has shown good initial results, but early complications and mixed results limit its widespread acceptance and use [6][7][8][9][10]. Unfortunately, there are limited remodeling data in the literature with current-generation endografts [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited data on TEVAR/EVAR for patients with MFS and only a few case reports presented PETTICOAT technique for patients with MFS 8 . A study reported that the rate of the primary treatment failure in patients with MFS treated with TEVAR/EVAR was 44% due to endoleaks 3 .…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average postoperative MV time was 46.9 (6.7-151.2) hours, since three patients had relatively long MV times of 84.7 h, 95.8 h, and 151.2 h. The average length of stay in ICU was 7.7 (4-17) days, with 3 patients more than 9 days because of CRRT therapy, pneumonia and re-intubation, and postoperative delirium. The mean postoperative hospital length of stay was 15.7 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) days, and the average total hospitalization cost was 268, 909 RMB (142,888 to 527,642).…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%