2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The policy and praxis of compensation for land expropriations in China: An appraisal from the perspective of social exclusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Since parcels that are not near other parcels are not part of a cluster, these parcels are dropped, leading to 5,675 observations in 1,874 clusters for the residential land sample and 4,052 observations in 1,410 clusters for the commercial land sample. 16 We refer to these data as the matched sample.…”
Section: Results Using Cluster Fixed Effects (Matched-pair Approach)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Since parcels that are not near other parcels are not part of a cluster, these parcels are dropped, leading to 5,675 observations in 1,874 clusters for the residential land sample and 4,052 observations in 1,410 clusters for the commercial land sample. 16 We refer to these data as the matched sample.…”
Section: Results Using Cluster Fixed Effects (Matched-pair Approach)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Chinese law, urban land is owned by the state, and rural land is owned by local economic collectives. To facilitate urban expansion, local governments acquire land from farmers at the urban fringe, paying compensation that is often substantially below market value (Ding 2007, Hui et al 2013). The local governments then transfer land-use rights to independent developers via a leasehold, generating revenue that can be used for public investment and other purposes.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few dissatisfied landacquired households admitted some disadvantages of environmental outcomes such as cleaner living environment. These findings support the research of Morris-Jung and Roth (2010), Kusiluka et al (2011), andGe andNing (2012), and Hui et al (2013) in indicating the negative environment outcomes of land acquisition. Conversely, they contradict Q.…”
Section: Environmental Inputs and Outcomessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, the amount of payment received is inadequate to enable the relocated people to set up similar settlements and maintain their normal lives. This insufficiency of compensation is exacerbated by the delays in compensation that have plunged land-acquired households into more financial difficulties (Behera, 2015;Hui, Bao, & Zhang, 2013;Kusiluka et al, 2011). Furthermore, land acquisition can place land-acquired households in a situation of facing issues of livelihood in the long term if they are farmers whose land is their only mean of living (Ghatak & Mookherjee, 2011;Kabra, 2016;Kusiluka et al, 2011;Van de Walle & Cratty, 2002).…”
Section: Economic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of expropriation often involves either threats of violence or actual violence, and attempts by expropriated farmers to protest against perceived injustice can be blocked in various ways [37]. There are no independent courts for the owners of rural farmland to appeal for unjust treatment [38]. Therefore, higher property rights integrity may only provide a weak contribution to perceived tenure security in the face of land expropriation.…”
Section: The Impact Of Property Rights Integrity On Tenure Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%