2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
141
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
141
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these features have been suggested by the psycholinguistic literature, reported correlations with personality ratings are generally weak: it was not obvious that they would improve accuracies of statistical models on unseen subjects. Computational work on modelling personality has primarily focused on methods for expressing personality in virtual agents and tutorial systems, and concepts related to personality such as politeness, emotion, or social intelligence (Walker, Cahn, & Whittaker, 1997;André, Klesen, Gebhard, Allen, & Rist, 1999;Lester, Towns, & FitzGerald, 1999;Wang, Johnson, Mayer, Rizzo, Shaw, & Collins, 2005) inter alia. Studies have shown that user evaluations of agent personality depend on the user's own personality (Reeves & Nass, 1996;Cassell & Bickmore, 2003), suggesting that an ability to model the user's personality is required.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these features have been suggested by the psycholinguistic literature, reported correlations with personality ratings are generally weak: it was not obvious that they would improve accuracies of statistical models on unseen subjects. Computational work on modelling personality has primarily focused on methods for expressing personality in virtual agents and tutorial systems, and concepts related to personality such as politeness, emotion, or social intelligence (Walker, Cahn, & Whittaker, 1997;André, Klesen, Gebhard, Allen, & Rist, 1999;Lester, Towns, & FitzGerald, 1999;Wang, Johnson, Mayer, Rizzo, Shaw, & Collins, 2005) inter alia. Studies have shown that user evaluations of agent personality depend on the user's own personality (Reeves & Nass, 1996;Cassell & Bickmore, 2003), suggesting that an ability to model the user's personality is required.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical rationale is that personalization techniques-such as using conversational style or polite wording-creates a sense of social partnership with the narrator in which learners try harder to make sense of what their conversational partner is saying. In 11 of 11 experiments, involving computer-based lessons on lungs, lightning, botany, and industrial engineering, learners who received words in conversational style performed better on transfer tests than did learners who received words in formal style (Mayer, Fennell, Farmer, & Campbell, 2004, Experiments 1, 2, and 3; Moreno & Mayer, 2000b, Experiments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5;Moreno & Mayer, 2004, Experiments 1a and 1b;Wang et al, 2008). The median effect size was 1.11, which is a large effect.…”
Section: Two Principles For Fostering Generative Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consist of the aspects of the visual and auditory presence of the APA that are hypothesized to ''make the learning experience more interesting, believable, or natural'' (p. 508). Empirical studies of these properties have explored the influence of the APA's age, gender, ethnicity, politeness, responsiveness, dynamism, and visual appeal, among others (e.g., André et al 1996;Arroyo et al 2011Arroyo et al , 2009Baylor 2011;Baylor and Kim 2004;Baylor and Ryu 2003;Craig et al 2002;Domagk 2010;Kim et al 2007;Lester et al 1997;Moreno 2004;Moreno et al 2000;Plant et al 2009;Wang et al 2008;Woolf et al 2010). Given our special interest in gender and science education, we summarize below the empirical studies that have investigated gender and motivation in relation to APAs in virtual science learning environments.…”
Section: Animated Pedagogical Agents and Student Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is somewhat strange in view of the fact that motivation, ''the process whereby goal-directed activity is instigated and sustained'' (Pintrich and Schunk 2002, p. 5), can be considered a precondition of successful inquiry learning. Learning is at risk when students exert little effort because they lack confidence in their ability to complete inquiry activities successfully and fail to perceive the relevance of task engagement (Wang et al 2008). This study investigates whether student motivation in a science inquiry learning environment can be enhanced via motivational support from an animated pedagogical agent (APA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%