The poverty game and the pension game: The role of reciprocity

Abstract

General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research-You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain-You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Understanding Savings, Pensions and Life Assurance in 16-21-Year-Olds

“…There is very little in the social science literature on pensions (Van der Heijden et al, 1998;Webley et al, 2001). Piachaud (1974) studied attitudes of 1200 people to pensions in order to discover people's opinions on the adequacy of pensions, how much they believed pensions should be and whether they would be willing to pay for higher pensions.…”

Evolutionary Stable Solution Concepts for Initial Play

“…To illustrate, consider the gift exchange experiment of Van der Heijden, Nelissen, Potters & Verbon (1998). Two players live for two periods.…”

‘Not a neutral event’: Clinical psychologists' experiences of gifts in therapeutic relationships

“…Despite being theorized in anthropology, sociology, and psychoanalysis, gifts have received limited attention in empirical research. Where research has been conducted, it has often overlooked gift meaning, privileging instead the tactics of gift‐giving (e.g., Van der Heijden, Nelissen, Potters, & Verbon, 1998). However, intra‐ and inter‐psychic meanings have been identified as central to what constitutes a gift (Belk, 1996; Ruth, 1996).…”