2016
DOI: 10.2319/122115-875.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The predictability of transverse changes with Invisalign

Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the predictability of arch expansion using Invisalign. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four adult white patients were selected to be part of this retrospective study. Pre-and posttreatment digital models created from an iTero scan were obtained from a single orthodontist practitioner. Digital models from Clincheck were also obtained from Align Technology. Linear values of upper and lower arch widths were measured for canines, premolars, and first molars at two different points: lingual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
108
2
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
14
108
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be the reason why, as stated by Houle et al, aligners become less accurate going from the anterior to the posterior region. 20 Considering the overall results obtained through FEM analysis, it could be stated that the most efficient configuration in displacement/anchorage loss/PDL stress ratio was ATT 4.5 with 1.28 of activation. Generally speaking, 1.28 of activation seemed to deliver force levels on the PDL, which better fit with the ''optimal force paradigm'' of biology of tooth movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This could be the reason why, as stated by Houle et al, aligners become less accurate going from the anterior to the posterior region. 20 Considering the overall results obtained through FEM analysis, it could be stated that the most efficient configuration in displacement/anchorage loss/PDL stress ratio was ATT 4.5 with 1.28 of activation. Generally speaking, 1.28 of activation seemed to deliver force levels on the PDL, which better fit with the ''optimal force paradigm'' of biology of tooth movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is important to only evaluate recent evidence for products that are constantly evolving. There have been many new updates in clear aligner technology such as precision cuts, precision bite ramps and tooth attachments that possibly have resulted in a more precision for tooth movement . This could mean that some of the drawbacks previously identified with this therapy have been addressed, at least partially, in updated versions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine schwierige Zahnbewegung für herausnehmbare Aligner ist jedoch die dentoalveoläre Expansion: In der Maxilla werden nur 72,8 % der geplanten Expansion erreicht: 82,9 % im Bereich der Zahnkronen und 62,7 % im Bereich der Gingiva [13]. Daher ist eine geplante Überkorrektur, die präoperativ beinahe einen posterioren Scherenbiss erzeugt, essentiell.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified