The Principle of Equality Among Member States of the European Union

Rossi, Lucia Serena

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66137-7_1

Cited by 24 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…2 Para un análisis de la conexión entre ambos principios de primacía e igualdad véanse: Lenaerts ( 8 oct., 2020 y Rossi (2017).…”

Section: Turbulencias Sobre La Primacía Del Derecho De La Ue: úLtimos Desafíos Respuestas Y Aportaciones Turbulence Over the Primacy Of Eunclassified

Turbulencias sobre la primacía del Derecho de la UE: últimos desafíos, respuestas y aportaciones

Eceizabarrena

2021

REDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recientemente se han producido una serie de resoluciones de diversos tribunales constitucionales que vienen a desafiar abiertamente el principio de primacía del Derecho de la Unión, haciendo valer para ello diversos límites derivados de la Constitución nacional. Una vez apuntadas muy sucintamente estas decisiones conflictivas, así como los mecanismos existentes para garantizar la primacía del Derecho de la Unión y los límites que se suelen oponer a la misma, el trabajo se centra en indicar las posibles vías para resolver la contraposición entre norma constitucional y Derecho de la Unión, y en recoger algunas propuestas que pueden contribuir a encauzar este tipo de turbulencias (jurisdiccionales) respecto al principio de primacía. Propuestas tanto en lo concerniente a la posición de la jurisdicción constitucional nacional ante tales conflictos, como a la dinámica decisoria desarrollada por parte del TJUE en los mismos. Buscando puentes sobre aguas turbulentas.

show abstract

“…2 Para un análisis de la conexión entre ambos principios de primacía e igualdad véanse: Lenaerts ( 8 oct., 2020 y Rossi (2017).…”

Section: Turbulencias Sobre La Primacía Del Derecho De La Ue: úLtimos Desafíos Respuestas Y Aportaciones Turbulence Over the Primacy Of Eunclassified

Turbulencias sobre la primacía del Derecho de la UE: últimos desafíos, respuestas y aportaciones

Eceizabarrena

2021

REDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…77 With the increase in the ability of international (and arguably, supranational) organisations to assume responsibility for carrying out the common interest of its members, it is becoming likelier that those members will decrease their insistence on their 'sovereign status and, correlatively, to equality'. 78 Indeed, placing the individual as the 'fundamental moral unit of concern' 79 demands a move away from the formalistic view of equality of Member States. The cosmopolitan literature emphasises the drawbacks that equality of states inflicts upon the equality of individuals: 80 … political equality among states is of value only so far as it contributes to justice as goal or as process.…”

Section: The Normative Core Of Constitutional Pluralism and Consmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructive Versus Destructive Conflict: Taking Stock of the Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence in the EU

Bobić¹

2020

Camb. Yearb. Eur. Legal Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article argues that constitutional pluralism is not a theory merely for times of equanimity, but crucially, in times of constitutional conflict. Given that it rests on the premise of regarding law as a dynamic, incrementally developing creature, constitutional conflict is no exceptional event, and represents an important element of the system's functioning. However, this does not mean that every point of conflict necessarily means progress for the pluralist system as a whole: it is possible to distinguish constructive from destructive conflict. In this respect, this piece will put forward a normative argument concerning the limits to which the auto-correct function of constitutional pluralism can stretch. In so doing, this piece will look at the recent jurisprudence of constitutional conflict at the EU and national level to demonstrate the limits of constructive conflict, as well as show how the example of Poland falls into the category of destructive conflict.

show abstract

“…This would create an order of priorities. 93 If a common Union strategy exists to adopt a certain measure, it should first be assessed whether the measure can be adopted by the Union as a whole. Should that prove impossible, it should then be verified whether the measure can be adopted under enhanced cooperation.…”

Section: Rethinking the Relationship Between Internal And External DImentioning

confidence: 99%

Differentiated integration and the principle of loyalty

Miglio¹

2018

European Constitutional Law Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Principle of Equality Among Member States of the European Union

Cited by 24 publications

References 23 publications

Turbulencias sobre la primacía del Derecho de la UE: últimos desafíos, respuestas y aportaciones

Turbulencias sobre la primacía del Derecho de la UE: últimos desafíos, respuestas y aportaciones

Constructive Versus Destructive Conflict: Taking Stock of the Recent Constitutional Jurisprudence in the EU

Differentiated integration and the principle of loyalty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About