2011
DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2010.537674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The privilege of perversities: race, class and education among polyamorists and kinksters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Across two studies, our findings provide insight into general perceptions about a type of CNM relationship that is attracting increasing attention in the empirical literature Mitchell et al, 2013;Morrison et al, 2013;Sheff, 2014;Sheff & Hammers, 2011). Nonetheless, it is important to recognise some limitations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across two studies, our findings provide insight into general perceptions about a type of CNM relationship that is attracting increasing attention in the empirical literature Mitchell et al, 2013;Morrison et al, 2013;Sheff, 2014;Sheff & Hammers, 2011). Nonetheless, it is important to recognise some limitations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Research on individuals in polyamorous relationships could also become more generalizable by exploring the ways in which polyamory and other CNM relationships intersect with other social stratification variables, such as race, class, education and (dis)ability (e.g., Barker & Langdridge, 2010;Haritaworn et al, 2006;Noel, 2006;Sheff & Hammers, 2011). The current view of polyamory that dominates the literature is overrepresented by White/European-American, upper middle-class, able-bodied and educated individuals (Noel, 2006;Sheff, 2014).…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Williams, 2010); class issues and privilege broadly (Haritaworn et al, 2006;Klesse, 2013); neoliberalism (Woltersdorff, 2011); therapy issues and alternative approaches (e.g. Barker, 2011;Keppel, 2006;Weitzman, 2006); communal living (Aguilar, 2013); the criminalisation of plural unions (Barnett, 2013); and kink (Sheff & Hammers, 2011). There is also some work devoted to general discussions of the dynamics of open non-monogamies (e.g.…”
Section: Spectres Of Promiscuity: Gay Male and Bisexual Non-monogamiementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous research on American BDSM participants, such as Newmahr's (2011) and Sheff and Hammers's (2011), has sometimes observed that there are many Pagans within the BDSM subculture; however, this research has almost always treated the presence of Pagans in the BDSM scene as almost coincidental rather than stemming from some more socially meaningful overlap between the two subcultures. Zussman and Pierce (1998:35) were the only observers to suggest a deeper connection, concluding their article with a short paragraph offering the tantalizing observation that modern Paganism "is beginning to provide a historical and mythological context and validation for S/M, bondage and fetish play."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%