2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic and predictive impact of low estrogen receptor expression in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction Traditionally, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has been defined as tumors with ≥1% positive for ER. The updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines recommend that tumors with ER expression of 1%-10% should be classified as ER-low-positive, recognizing the limited clinical evidence on the prognostic and predictive role of low ER expression. We aimed to investigate the predictive role of ER-low expression to neoadjuv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Pakkola et al. ( 31 ) confirmed these results in a meta-analysis that ERlo breast cancer was associated with worse DFS than ERhi breast cancer, and there was no statistically significant difference between ERlo and ERneg breast cancer in terms of DFS and OS. It is important to emphasize that even though this trend was demonstrated in other studies ( 32 , 33 ), there are some conflicting reports.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, Pakkola et al. ( 31 ) confirmed these results in a meta-analysis that ERlo breast cancer was associated with worse DFS than ERhi breast cancer, and there was no statistically significant difference between ERlo and ERneg breast cancer in terms of DFS and OS. It is important to emphasize that even though this trend was demonstrated in other studies ( 32 , 33 ), there are some conflicting reports.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is possible that chemoprevention through hormonal therapy may play a role in preventing BC in LFS carriers, and future studies should evaluate this as a potential preventive treatment. Treatment-oriented classification of subgroups of BC has evolved in the last decade ( 28 , 29 , 44 , 45 ). Previous published LFS BC studies considered ER-positive cut off greater than or equal to 1% ( 9 , 25 27 ), nevertheless, updated guidelines ( 28 , 29 ) incorporated the concept of ER-low-positive due to its potential impact in prognosis and predictive role in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response ( 44 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment-oriented classification of subgroups of BC has evolved in the last decade ( 28 , 29 , 44 , 45 ). Previous published LFS BC studies considered ER-positive cut off greater than or equal to 1% ( 9 , 25 27 ), nevertheless, updated guidelines ( 28 , 29 ) incorporated the concept of ER-low-positive due to its potential impact in prognosis and predictive role in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response ( 44 ). Our study observed 6.5% (3/45) of ER-low-positive IBCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the TNBC population also included patients with 1-9% of ER expression. It has been consistently reported that tumours with the so-called ERlow phenotype share clinical features and behaviours more with "pure" TN [42,43], thus fuelling a vivid debate regarding the most clinically relevant ER cut-off for defining TNBC. Importantly, both in our study and BMSO's, TNBC was defined by adopting a 10% cut-off for ER negativity, thus generating two orders of considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%