2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-008-9195-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proportional Effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Normality of data distribution can be evaluated using histograms and box-plots or by calculating some coefficient of asymmetry. Skewed variables often show a proportional effect, i.e., a higher variability in high valued areas and a lower variability in low valued areas that distort variogram results (Manchuk et al 2009). Although formally not required, a normal distribution of data improves the autocorrelation analysis and can be achieved with a logarithm transformation.…”
Section: Geostatisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normality of data distribution can be evaluated using histograms and box-plots or by calculating some coefficient of asymmetry. Skewed variables often show a proportional effect, i.e., a higher variability in high valued areas and a lower variability in low valued areas that distort variogram results (Manchuk et al 2009). Although formally not required, a normal distribution of data improves the autocorrelation analysis and can be achieved with a logarithm transformation.…”
Section: Geostatisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proportionality is typical of attributes that follow positively skewed distributions, such as our coal bed thickness (Fig. 6) (Manchuk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The strongly skewed, approximately log-normal distribution makes the OK of original data problematic due to the proportional effect (e.g. Manchuk et al, 2009) which results in regionally different variogram sills. The mean variogram may then not capture the regional correlation structure properly.…”
Section: Geostatistical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%