The proteome mapping—Metabolic modeling, and functional elucidation of the microbiome in the remediation of dyes and treating industrial effluents

Aishwarya, S.; Rajalakshmi, S.; Krishnaswamy, Veena Gayathri

doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-96113-4.00008-1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to the research conducted on human diseases metaproteomics has also been extensively applied in the field of soil ecosystems – soil metaproteomics ( Bastida et al, 2016b , 2018 ; Chourey and Hettich, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ) – with specific focus on the rhizosphere ( Renu et al, 2019 ; White et al, 2021 ). Other environmental phenomena such as bioremediation ( Bastida et al, 2016a ; Aishwarya et al, 2022 ) and biodegradation ( Chang et al, 2018 ; Gunasekaran et al, 2022 ; Xie et al, 2022 ) has been explored…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of the global impact of metaproteomics research

Ascandari,

Aminu,

Safdi

et al. 2023

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundMetaproteomics is a subfield in meta-omics that is used to characterize the proteome of a microbial community. Despite its importance and the plethora of publications in different research area, scientists struggle to fully comprehend its functional impact on the study of microbiomes. In this study, bibliometric analyses are used to evaluate the current state of metaproteomic research globally as well as evaluate the specific contribution of Africa to this burgeoning research area. In this study, we use bibliometric analyses to evaluate the current state of metaproteomic research globally, identify research frontiers and hotspots, and further predict future trends in metaproteomics. The specific contribution of Africa to this research area was evaluated.MethodsRelevant documents from 2004 to 2022 were extracted from the Scopus database. The documents were subjected to bibliometric analyses and visualization using VOS viewer and Biblioshiny package in R. Factors such as the trends in publication, country and institutional cooperation networks, leading scientific journals, author’s productivity, and keywords analyses were conducted. The African publications were ranked using Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) scores.ResultsA total of 1,138 documents were included and the number of publications increased drastically from 2004 to 2022 with more publications (170) reported in 2021. In terms of publishers, Frontiers in Microbiology had the highest number of total publications (62). The United States of America (USA), Germany, China, and Canada, together with other European countries were the most productive. Institution-wise, the Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Germany had more publications while Max Plank Institute had the highest total collaborative link strength. Jehmlich N. was the most productive author whereas Hettich RL had the highest h-index of 63. Regarding Africa, only 2.2% of the overall publications were from the continent with more publication outputs from South Africa. More than half of the publications from the continent had an FWCI score ≥ 1.ConclusionThe scientific outputs of metaproteomics are rapidly evolving with developed countries leading the way. Although Africa showed prospects for future progress, this could only be accelerated by providing funding, increased collaborations, and mentorship programs.

show abstract