2004
DOI: 10.1086/jar.60.3.3630755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proto-Numic Kinship System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radcliffe‐Brown had stressed the ‘two lines’ found in the grandkin arrangements with cross and parallel distinguished. Hage ( e.g ., Hage et al ) emphasized alternating generation equivalence between grandkin and grandchildren found among the Kariera and stated as secondary criteria for the ‘Kariera system’ in Radcliffe‐Brown's typology. We show that alternating generation equivalence is a pattern independent of Kariera and should not be included in the definition of Kariera.…”
Section: What Is ‘Kariera’?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radcliffe‐Brown had stressed the ‘two lines’ found in the grandkin arrangements with cross and parallel distinguished. Hage ( e.g ., Hage et al ) emphasized alternating generation equivalence between grandkin and grandchildren found among the Kariera and stated as secondary criteria for the ‘Kariera system’ in Radcliffe‐Brown's typology. We show that alternating generation equivalence is a pattern independent of Kariera and should not be included in the definition of Kariera.…”
Section: What Is ‘Kariera’?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some casual probing shows that reconstructions of Proto-Dene-Eyak, Proto-Alongquian, Proto-Numic, and Proto-Mayan kin terminologies, for example, all featured cross-parallel distinctions mapping cross relatives as affi nes in Dravidian or Kariera form (Hage 2003 ;Hage et al 2004 ;Hockett 1964 ;Ives 1990 ;Krauss n.d./ 1977 ;Wheeler 1982 ). Thus, one could argue that in roughly the mid-Holocene, such kin systems were quite widespread in North America; it is likely their more ancient antecedents would have had related structural properties.…”
Section: Warranting the Use Of Specifi C Kin Forms In Modelling The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%