1948
DOI: 10.1037/h0061266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Purdue Pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
683
1
5

Year Published

1958
1958
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,099 publications
(699 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
683
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[25], was used to measure muscle strength of the upper extremity. Criterion validity using integrated upper extremity muscles has been established [26]. A 5-pound dumbbell was used for women and an 8-pound dumbbell for men.…”
Section: Assessments Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25], was used to measure muscle strength of the upper extremity. Criterion validity using integrated upper extremity muscles has been established [26]. A 5-pound dumbbell was used for women and an 8-pound dumbbell for men.…”
Section: Assessments Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. Purdue Pegboard Test [19], Nine Hole Peg Test [13], Moberg Picking-Up Test [15] und Allensbacher Feinmotoriktest [14], doch keiner konnte sich im geriatrischen Assessment breit durchsetzen. Mögliche Gründe sind neben fehlender Validierung in der geriatrischen Klientel die Anschaffungskosten, die Notwendigkeit von Erfahrung zur korrekten Beurteilung und der Zeitaufwand.…”
Section: Selbstständigkeit Und Lebensqualität Sind Eng Korreliertunclassified
“…It was developed by Dr. Joseph Tiffin, an Industrial Psychologist at Purdue University, in 1948 7 , and originally intended for assessing the dexterity of assembly line workers.…”
Section: Introduction 11 Hand Function Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dexterity tests are often based upon ordinal scales and are still widely used in rehabilitation and therapy [5][6][7][8] . The main limitations of these assessments are low reliability and sensitivity and, more importantly, these tests are not robust enough to correlate well with the patient's wide range of hand movement patterns 9 .…”
Section: Introduction 11 Hand Function Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%