2018
DOI: 10.1590/0101-7438.2018.038.02.0331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rank Reversal Problem in Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Literature Review

Abstract: Despite the importance of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques for constructing effective decision models, there are many criticisms due to the occurrence of a problem called rank reversal. Nevertheless, there is a lack of a systematic literature review on this important subject which involves different methods. This study reviews the pertinent literature on rank reversal, based on 130 related articles published from 1980 to 2015 in international journals, which were gathered and analyzed according … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of its many advantages, the TOPSIS method, like many multi-attribute decision-making methods, can produce "rank reversal" outcomes, as several authors have described [32][33][34]. In this phenomenon, the alternatives' order of preference changes when an alternative is added to or removed from the decision problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of its many advantages, the TOPSIS method, like many multi-attribute decision-making methods, can produce "rank reversal" outcomes, as several authors have described [32][33][34]. In this phenomenon, the alternatives' order of preference changes when an alternative is added to or removed from the decision problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, several studies have debated about the rank reversal problem presented in AHP, a phenomenon consisting of changes observed in the final ranking order after the addition or removal of an alternative (Ishizaka & Labib, ; Rodríguez, Ortega, & Concepción, ; Aires & Ferreira, ). This problem is also a limitation in DEA (Shin, ; Soltanifar & Shahghobadi, ) and Simple Additive Weighting (Aires & Ferreira, ; Bendaoud, Didi, & Abdennebi, ; Shin, Lee, Chun, & Chung, ). Another constraint in the DEA method is that positive outputs and inputs are needed for each decision‐making unit (Huang & Li, ).…”
Section: Primary Studies From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next step is then to identify the most suitable MCDM approach to address this particular aim (see the coming subsection). For instance, several studies have debated about the rank reversal problem presented in AHP, a phenomenon consisting of changes observed in the final ranking order after the addition or removal of an alternative (Ishizaka & Labib, 2009;Rodríguez, Ortega, & Concepción, 2016;Aires & Ferreira, 2018). This problem is also a limitation in DEA (Shin, 2017;Soltanifar & Shahghobadi, 2014) and…”
Section: Modelling Adoption Of Assistive Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e problem of rank reversal in the TOPSIS method has received great attention, and different scholars have tried to find satisfactory solutions from an experimental or theoretical level [52][53][54][55][56][57]. By collecting 130 related papers published in international journals from 1980 to 2015, Aires and Ferreira provided an extensive literature review on MCDM methodologies and rank reversals, including the TOPSIS method [52]. Zavadskas et al [53] also reviewed the development of the TOPSIS method from 2000 to 2015, but did not discuss the solution of rank reversal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%