2019
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Refined Hurley Patient Questionnaire: An Accurate Self-assessment Instrument for Deriving the Correct Refined Hurley Stage in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk factors (sex, BMI, smoking history) and FO tetrad components defined five distinct categories in Rondags et al 26 They manifested different clinical characteristics, with comedones being more frequent in the ‘females with stereotypical HS’ and ‘male HS’ groups (58% and 55.3%) versus the ‘females with a single exogenous risk factor for HS’ category and sinus tracts were predominant in the ‘male HS’ subtype. No risk factors or FO comorbidities were observed in the ‘limited HS’ subtype.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Risk factors (sex, BMI, smoking history) and FO tetrad components defined five distinct categories in Rondags et al 26 They manifested different clinical characteristics, with comedones being more frequent in the ‘females with stereotypical HS’ and ‘male HS’ groups (58% and 55.3%) versus the ‘females with a single exogenous risk factor for HS’ category and sinus tracts were predominant in the ‘male HS’ subtype. No risk factors or FO comorbidities were observed in the ‘limited HS’ subtype.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…137 Concordance in classifications might relate to the existence of a limited set of variables considered for phenotyping. When adding elements such as comorbidities, laboratory and imaging assessments, quality of life, level of disease-related distress and treatment modalities, more complex subgroups were described, 18,24,26 with significant and possibly constant contributors to phenotypes. However, such attempts have not been validated, as they include hospital-referred patients who might form overrepresented groups without scalable forms at a population level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low proportion of Hurley stage I may be explained by HS participants who register on ComPaRe being most concerned by their disease because they are more severely affected. It could be also an incorrect evaluation of Hurley stage self-assessment by participants, although several studies showed an interrater reliability of 76% between patients and physicians in the assessment of Hurley stage using photographs [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient-focused data provide a comprehensive land-scape of patient satisfaction with disease management and the issued treatment. A growing body of evidence supports that patient reports are accurate ( 18 , 19 ) and, as stated in a recent phase II study, may be even more sensitive than global assessments by physicians ( 20 ). Reinforced by a recommendation of the HS ALLIANCE ( 16 ) to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in studies, several PRO studies have been conducted for HS to evaluate quality of life, symptoms, pain, disease severity, and effectiveness of specific treatments ( 21 23 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%