2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00412.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation between Individual Differences and Accountants' Fraud Detection Ability

Abstract: This report examines the potential application of the deception detection literature to auditing research. A pilot study focusing on auditor quality perceptions post Enron is used to explore the potential relevance of deception detection research theory and techniques. The pilot study findings highlight some potential areas for researchers to focus on in terms of construct, internal, external and statistical validity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several accounting studies have investigated how some personality traits of accountants interact with other variables within an ethics framework (Shaub et al 1993;Tsui and Gul 1996;Bernardi 1997;Hyatt and Prawitt 2001;Yetmar and Eastman 2000;Clikeman et al 2001;Douglas et al 2001;Pope 2005;Shafer 2008;Wakefield 2008;Shafer and Simmons 2008;Fathil and Schmidtke 2010;Hartmann and Maas 2010;Shafer and Wang 2011), most of these studies used subjects from the U.S. The results from the studies that did include culturally different subjects suggest that individuals' Machiavellianism and ethical orientation vary across cultures (Douglas and Wier 2005;Rawwas et al 2005;Robertson et al 2008;Vitell and Patwardhan 2008;Forsyth et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although several accounting studies have investigated how some personality traits of accountants interact with other variables within an ethics framework (Shaub et al 1993;Tsui and Gul 1996;Bernardi 1997;Hyatt and Prawitt 2001;Yetmar and Eastman 2000;Clikeman et al 2001;Douglas et al 2001;Pope 2005;Shafer 2008;Wakefield 2008;Shafer and Simmons 2008;Fathil and Schmidtke 2010;Hartmann and Maas 2010;Shafer and Wang 2011), most of these studies used subjects from the U.S. The results from the studies that did include culturally different subjects suggest that individuals' Machiavellianism and ethical orientation vary across cultures (Douglas and Wier 2005;Rawwas et al 2005;Robertson et al 2008;Vitell and Patwardhan 2008;Forsyth et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A review of the extant literature indicates that Machiavellianism is frequently included in personality trait research in accounting (Pope 2005;Wakefield 2008;Shafer and Simmons 2008;Fathil and Schmidtke 2010;Hartmann and Maas 2010;Shafer and Wang 2011). Machiavellians are those who manipulate others to achieve their desired goals.…”
Section: Machiavellianismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La pérdida media de un caso en particular de fraude ocupacional fue de US$ 150.000. Considerando que el fraude es costoso y la detección del fraude es compleja, la identificación de métodos para reducir el fraude debería ser de suma importancia para las partes interesadas (stakeholders), incluidos accionistas, instituciones financieras y clientes (Fathil y Schmidtke, 2010). Ello implica la creación o fortalecimiento de una unidad independiente que permita evaluar o implementar de manera oportuna (ex-ante) programas de prevención de fraude.…”
Section: Fraudeunclassified