2018
DOI: 10.15703/kjc.19.1.201802.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between counselor’s attachment and working alliance: mediating effect of countertransference management ability and empathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criterion validity of the K‐CFI subscales was confirmed to be negatively related to CT behaviors (Jeon & Ha, 2015; Lee & Han, 2019). On the other hand, the K‐CFI subscales were found to be positively related to the counselor's self‐efficacy (Choi & Lee, 2009; Park & Lee, 2020), working alliance (Cho & Kim, 2018; Yoon & Chung, 2012), and counseling outcome (Lee, 2010; Yoon & Chung, 2012). The reliability in the current study was 0.76 for self‐insight, 0.82 for self‐integration, 0.83 for empathy ability, 0.82 for anxiety management, and 0.83 for conceptualizing skills.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criterion validity of the K‐CFI subscales was confirmed to be negatively related to CT behaviors (Jeon & Ha, 2015; Lee & Han, 2019). On the other hand, the K‐CFI subscales were found to be positively related to the counselor's self‐efficacy (Choi & Lee, 2009; Park & Lee, 2020), working alliance (Cho & Kim, 2018; Yoon & Chung, 2012), and counseling outcome (Lee, 2010; Yoon & Chung, 2012). The reliability in the current study was 0.76 for self‐insight, 0.82 for self‐integration, 0.83 for empathy ability, 0.82 for anxiety management, and 0.83 for conceptualizing skills.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%