The relationship between health expenditure indicators and economic growth in OECD countries: A Driscoll-Kraay approach

Abstract

IntroductionThe main purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between health expenditure indicators and economic growth in OECD countries.MethodsIn this context, health expenditures and economic indicators data of 21 OECD countries were analyzed by the Driscoll-Kraay standard error approach within the scope of panel data analysis. While Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and income per capita were used as dependent variables, the amount of out-of-pocket health spending, per capita health expenditure, the amount of public health expenditure, the ratio of drug expenditures to gross domestic product, the share of current health expenditures in GDP were used as independent variables.ResultsAccording to the results, in the model (Model 1) where real GDP level was used as the dependent variable, all health expenditure indicators were positively related to the economic growth. When the estimation results of Model 1 are examined, it is predicted that there will be an increase of 0.09% in GDP in case of a 1% increase in the share allocated to health services from GDP. In case of a 1% increase in the amount of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare, it is foreseen that there may be an increase of 0.04% in the real GDP. In the model (Model 2) where the per capita income variable is the dependent variable, it is seen that the increase in out- of-pocket health spending has a decreasing effect on the per capita income level, while the increase in public expenditures has an increasing effect on the per capita income level. From the findings of Model 2, it was found that if a 1% increase in the share of current health expenditures in GDP, there may be an increase of 0.06% in the amount of per capita income.DiscussionConcludingly, it is possible to say that that public resources allocated to health services play an important role in the economic growth.

Analyzing the nexus between tourism and CO2 emissions: the role of renewable energy and R&D

“…In addition to panel ARDL, the Driscoll and Kraay (1998) estimator (both for fixed and random effects) is employed to obtain further evidence in terms of the relationship between variables. The main advantage of the Driscoll-Kraay estimator is that it considers autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, and CSD (Beylik et al, 2022;Haseeb et al, 2023). The fixedand randomeffects results based on the Driscoll-Kraay estimators are documented in Table 8.…”

Immediate Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Heart and Kidney Transplantation and the Recovery Trends in 30 Developed and Less-Developed Countries

“…A limitation of our study was grouping the countries based on GDP. While GDP has been shown to be associated with many socioeconomic parameters, including healthcare, life expectancy [ 40 , 41 ], and healthcare expenditure [ 42 ], GDP may not be an indicator of the general well-being of the citizens of a country [ 43 ]. In addition, GDP can be a dependent variable because factors such as infectious diseases [ 44 ], types of government, and social stability [ 45 ] can affect GDP.…”

Another outlook into energy‐growth nexus in Mexico for sustainable development: Accounting for the combined impact of urbanization and trade openness

“…Other determinants of economic growth have also been identified in literature. The factors include employment/unemployment (Cetin et al, 2015), education (Cetin & Dogan, 2015), health and health expenditure (Beylik et al, 2022; Çetin & Ecevit, 2010), government size (Cetin, 2017), information technology (Magazzino et al, 2021) among others.…”