1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00383343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between moral decisions and their consequences: A tradeoff analysis approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are also consistent with prior research findings (e.g., Torgler, 2003;Swinyard et al, 1989) that cultural differences affect an individual's moral decision-making. Swinyard et al (1989) demonstrate that Americans will have greater utility for moral choices while Singaporeans will have greater utility for outcomes.…”
Section: T-test On Means Difference and Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are also consistent with prior research findings (e.g., Torgler, 2003;Swinyard et al, 1989) that cultural differences affect an individual's moral decision-making. Swinyard et al (1989) demonstrate that Americans will have greater utility for moral choices while Singaporeans will have greater utility for outcomes.…”
Section: T-test On Means Difference and Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Swinyard et al (1989) demonstrate that Americans will have greater utility for moral choices while Singaporeans will have greater utility for outcomes. In deciding upon an appropriate moral decision, while both the eastern and western subjects are equivalent in what is morally acceptable to them, the Americans lean toward what their traditional moral values tell them, and the Singaporeans lean toward what the outcomes tell them.…”
Section: T-test On Means Difference and Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several researchers have demonstrated that students engage in varied reasoning based on these different theories: deontology, utilitarianism, rational self-interest, Machiavellianism, etc. (Ashworth and Bannister, 1997;Lewis and Speck, 1990;McLafferty and Foust, 2004;Nickell and Herzog, 1996;Swinyard et al, 1989;Webster and Harmon, 2002). These findings should be tested in the specific context of plagiarism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Swinyard et al (1989) proposes a tradeoff analysis, aiming at investigating the ethical decision making a person might take under different financial gains. Most subsequent studies confirm the importance of financial gains as one of the crucial reasons to trigger the ethical dilemma of whether or not to pirate software (Swinyard et al 1990;Simpson et al 1994).…”
Section: Normative Expectations and Financial Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%