The relationship between the five minute Apgar score, mode of birth and neonatal outcomes

Thavarajah, Harshithaa; Flatley, Christopher; Kumar, Sailesh

doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1315666

Cited by 56 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 382,518 neonates were assessed in 16 studies; of those, 327,272 were neonates born by vaginal delivery and the rest (55,246) were by ECS. Except for three (9)(10)(11), all the studies showed that the incidence of respiratory morbidity was high in ECS (8,(12)(13)(14)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). In particular, two studies showed that the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 12.35 and 10 times more in neonates born by ECS (RR = 12.35; 95% CI: 0.66-222.…”

Section: Respiratory Morbidity and Mode Of Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Elective Cesarean Section on Term Pregnancies Has a High Risk for Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most recurrently carried out surgical procedures in modern obstetrics. Worldwide, about 18.5 million CSs are conducted annually. Of this, 21-33% are performed in middle-and high-income countries. The effectiveness of the CS in preventing maternal and prenatal mortality and morbidity is medically justifiable. However, cesarean delivery without demanding obstetrical indications, by mere maternal request, may expose the child to several risks over benefits. Therefore, we aim to compare spontaneous vaginal delivery (vaginal delivery other than operative vaginal deliveries) and elective CS (CS before the onset of labor, but not including emergency CS) in decreasing the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity. Objective: To compare the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity in ECS and spontaneous vaginal delivery. Methods: A literature search was performed through visiting an electronic database (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL) and gray literature sources, including Google and Google Scholar, from January 2000 to May 2018. Original observational studies that reported the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity in relation to mode of delivery conducted in the English language were identified and screened. Joanna Briggs Institute's quality assessment tool for observational studies was used to critically appraise the methodological quality of studies. Synthesis of individual studies was conducted using the Review Manager Software version 5.3 for Windows. Heterogeneity among studies was explored using the Cochran's Q-test and the I 2 statistics. Pooled effect sizes in relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The flow of the study was prepared according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. Tefera et al. ECS Is Risk for Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Results: Sixteen studies were reviewed. A total of 327,272 neonates born by vaginal delivery and 55,246 born by ECS were included in this study. The risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was increased by 95% in neonates delivered by ECS (RR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.40-2.73) as compared with neonates born by spontaneous vaginal delivery. Conclusion: This study investigated the effect of mode of delivery on the respiratory morbidity without considering other risks and found that the ECS has a high risk of developing neonatal respiratory morbidities when compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery. So, we recommend discouraging unnecessary CS. registration: CRD42018104905.

show abstract

Section: Respiratory Morbidity and Mode Of Deliverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Elective Cesarean Section on Term Pregnancies Has a High Risk for Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, there are professionals involved in childbirth care that try to reduce the duration of the second stage by obstetric interventionism in order to avoid neonatal complications. Paradoxically, these interventions, such as immediate pushing (initiated as soon as complete dilation is identified) [7], instrumental birth [8] or fundal pressure [9], may themselves increase the risk of neonatal morbidity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship Between Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Short-Term Neonatal Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Infante-Torres¹,

Molina‐Alarcón

Arias-Arias³

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the association between prolonged second stage of labor and the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE were searched using the search strategy “Labor Stage, Second” AND (length OR duration OR prolonged OR abnormal OR excessive). Observational studies that examine the relationship between prolonged second stage of labor and neonatal outcomes were selected. Prolonged second stage of labor was defined as 4 h or more in nulliparous women and 3 h or more in multiparous women. The main neonatal outcomes were 5 min Apgar score <7, admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, neonatal sepsis and neonatal death. Data collection and quality assessment were carried out independently by the three reviewers. Twelve studies were selected including 266,479 women. In nulliparous women, a second stage duration greater than 4 h increased the risk of 5 min Apgar score <7, admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and neonatal sepsis and intubation. In multiparous women, a second stage of labor greater than 3 h was related to 5 min Apgar score <7, admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, meconium staining and composite neonatal morbidity. Prolonged second stage of labor increased the risk of 5 min Apgar score <7 and admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in nulliparous and multiparous women, without increasing the risk of neonatal death. This review demonstrates that prolonged second stage of labor increases the risk of neonatal complications in nulliparous and multiparous women.

show abstract

“…We set the cut-off value as an Apgar score 7, because neonatal complications including respiratory distress, feeding problems, hypothermia, and seizures are all significantly associated with the Apgar score lower than 7 (ref. 11,14 ). We recorded significant difference in Apgar scores of the 1, 5 and 10 min in groups of GA and RA, preferring RA.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

The influence of mode of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery on neonatal Apgar scores in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: secondary analysis of the results of an international survey in 2015

Harazim¹,

Štourač²,

Bláha³

et al. 2019

BIOMED PAP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBAAMA-INT Study Group Aims. The purpose of this international survey was to describe the impact of current practices and techniques of caesarean section on the neonatal Apgar score in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK). Methods. All Czech and Slovak departments that provide obstetric anaesthesia were invited to participate in a onemonth (November 2015) prospective study that monitored in details all peripartum anaesthetic practices, delivered by anaesthesiologists. Participating centers recorded all data on-line in the CLADE-IS database (Masaryk University, CZE). Results and Discussions. We collected data of 10119 women who delivered 10226 newborns. A caesarean section was recorded in 25.1% of deliveries (CZE 23.2%; SVK 30%). General anaesthesia was used for caesarean section in 37.5% of the cases (CZE 40%, SVK 33%). There was no statistically significant difference in the Apgar score lower than 7 in the 1, 5 or 10 min in groups of general and regional anaesthesia for caesarean section, when only elective sections of in-term babies with birth weight over 2500 g were analyzed. We found no statistically significant differences in the Apgar score in newborns of women intubated for caesarean section in rocuronium (n=21; 2.2%) and suxamethonium (n=889; 93%). Conclusion. We found no difference in neonatal outcomes in groups of general and regional anaesthesia for caesarean section when only out-of-risk newborns were analyzed. The risk factors were identified as follows: an acute caesarean section, preterm babies, birth weight less than 2 500 g, born in perinatological center and multiple pregnancy-second baby. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.

show abstract

The relationship between the five minute Apgar score, mode of birth and neonatal outcomes

Cited by 56 publications

References 28 publications

Elective Cesarean Section on Term Pregnancies Has a High Risk for Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Elective Cesarean Section on Term Pregnancies Has a High Risk for Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Relationship Between Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Short-Term Neonatal Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The influence of mode of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery on neonatal Apgar scores in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: secondary analysis of the results of an international survey in 2015

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About