The reliability and validity of the Iranian version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with Bone Metastases: the EORTC QLQ-BM22

Yekaninejad, Mir Saeed; Ahmadzadeh, Ahmad; Mosavi, Seyed H; Saffari, Mohsen; Pakpour, Amir H.; Tolooei, Fatemeh; Chow, Edward; Bottomley, Andrew

doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.864559

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The discriminant validity in both questionnaires was also satisfactory. That generally con rms the results obtained for the international study and follows data for Iranian and Spanish version for QLQ-INFO25 [24,33,34]. The high correlation between some items with scales other than their own (i.e.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…That means the tools can be used to compare various groups. The test-retest reliability for both modules was good as it was in other studies [24,33,34].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

“…Also previous studies validating this questionnaire for other populations claimed that all these tools measure different concepts [24,33,34].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of the EORTC information (QLQ-INFO25) and satisfaction with care (IN-PATSAT32) modules in Polish cancer patients’ population

Rudzińska,

Kukla,

Zygulska

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The IN-PATSAT32 and QLQ-INFO25 are questionnaires which can be applied to assess and improve communication with cancer patients, as well as for research and clinical trials aimed at assessing patients’ satisfaction and perception of the information received from nurses and other healthcare providers. Given the recently passed “Polish oncological network” act of law, the issue of patient satisfaction and its regular assessment is finally acknowledged in the socioeconomic and cultural context of Poland. The aim of this study was to perform validation of EORTC satisfaction with care QLQ-INFO25 and quality of information IN-PATSAT32 modules. Methods: The prospective cross-sectional study included patients from cancer reference center from Krakow, Poland. The translated and pilot-tested module QLQ-INFO25 was used together with core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and satisfaction module IN-PATSAT32. Adult patients with histological confirmation of any malignancy and ability to understand the questionnaire were included into the study. Results: 187 patients were enrolled, including 111 women and 76 men (mean age ± SD; 59.32 ± 10.4). Cronbach's alpha coefficients, range 0.83-0.85 for QLQ-INFO25 and 0.82-0.94 for IN-PATSAT32 showed positive internal consistency. Acceptable convergent and discriminant validity in multi-trait scaling analyses was seen for both modules with r<0.3 for all calculations. Interclass correlations proved satisfactory test-retest reliability. Conclusions: Polish versions of IN-PATSAT32 and QLQ-NFO25 are reliable and valid instruments providing domains not covered by core EORTC module. Tools are suitable for use in daily clinical practice, in research as well as in clinical trials in order to obtain data regarding patients’ perception of and satisfaction with received information within the socioeconomic and cultural context of Poland.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…That means the tools can be used to compare various groups. The test-retest reliability for both modules was good as it was in other studies [24,33,34].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of the EORTC information (QLQ-INFO25) and satisfaction with care (IN-PATSAT32) modules in Polish cancer patients’ population

Rudzińska,

Kukla,

Zygulska

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Three instruments were assessed for floor and ceiling effects in four studies 30 , 34 , 38 , 39 . All studies had an acceptable result, with no floor and ceiling effects observed.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement properties of health-related quality of life measures for people living with metastatic disease of the spine: a systematic review

Qiao,

Ding,

et al. 2023

International Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Patients with spinal metastases (SM) suffer from a significant quality of life (QoL) deterioration. The measurement of QoL has garnered significant attention. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of QoL measurement, systematically appraise the measurement properties of identified instruments, and facilitate the effective selection of an appropriate QoL instrument for patients with SM. Methods: This systematic review adhered to the newly revised Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Measurement property results were assessed using the adapted criteria. Each measurement property was allocated a separate rating (excellent, good, fair, or poor). “Best evidence synthesis” was performed using COSMIN outcomes and the quality of findings. Result: Two hundred and nine publications were included, and 18 instruments were identified. ECOG, EuroQol-5D, SF-36, SOSGOQ, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 were the top five instruments used for patients with SM in published literature. The measurement properties evaluated included internal consistency (four instruments), reliability (three instruments), validity (five instruments), validity (nine measures), floor and ceiling effects (four instruments), responsiveness (four instruments), and interpretability (three measures). Based on the limited evidence, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) had the best methodological quality. Conclusions: Owing to the limitation of BPI in assessment domains, we cannot fully support the use of BPI. For the lack of high-quality research, it is challenging to nominate a single appropriate measure. Additional studies needed to explore the evidence before a confirmatory decision is made.

show abstract

“…This study sought to evaluate a tool that met this need and addressed issues related solely to the characteristic symptoms of patients with bone metastasis in a simple and objective way. The QLQ-BM22 is an instrument available in the literature that has been translated and validated for use in Japan, Iran and Poland (4,(15)(16)(17)(18).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation into Portuguese, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of “The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer—Quality of Life Questionnaire—Bone Metastases-22”

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The reliability and validity of the Iranian version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with Bone Metastases: the EORTC QLQ-BM22

Cited by 6 publications

References 34 publications

Validation of the EORTC information (QLQ-INFO25) and satisfaction with care (IN-PATSAT32) modules in Polish cancer patients’ population

Validation of the EORTC information (QLQ-INFO25) and satisfaction with care (IN-PATSAT32) modules in Polish cancer patients’ population

Measurement properties of health-related quality of life measures for people living with metastatic disease of the spine: a systematic review

Translation into Portuguese, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of “The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer—Quality of Life Questionnaire—Bone Metastases-22”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About