2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcce.2023.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Research on Relative Knowledge Distances and Their Cognitive Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional fuzzy sets, for instance, merely take the measure of acceptance or membership into account, whereas IFS include both the measures of membership and non-membership into consideration along with a degree of hesitancy. Various new techniques have emerged in IFS in the past few decades for formulating new methodologies or helping in ranking, such as the score (see, e.g., [2]) and accuracy functions (see, e.g., [3]), knowledge distance (see, e.g., [4]), and various multi-criteria decision-making techniques see, e.g., [5]). These techniques have been helpful in reliability estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional fuzzy sets, for instance, merely take the measure of acceptance or membership into account, whereas IFS include both the measures of membership and non-membership into consideration along with a degree of hesitancy. Various new techniques have emerged in IFS in the past few decades for formulating new methodologies or helping in ranking, such as the score (see, e.g., [2]) and accuracy functions (see, e.g., [3]), knowledge distance (see, e.g., [4]), and various multi-criteria decision-making techniques see, e.g., [5]). These techniques have been helpful in reliability estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%