The revised Reception Conditions Directive and adequate and dignified material reception conditions for those seeking international protection

Velluti, Samantha

doi:10.1504/ijmbs.2016.077640

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On 4 May 2016, the European Commission launched a proposal for a utopian transformation of the asylum process to move "towards a sustainable and fair Common European Asylum System" (European Commission, 2016a). Based on the amended text pend-ing approval, it was anticipated that there would be some grey areas in the new scheme to enhance reception regulations (Slingenberg, 2021;Velutti, 2016). In this regard, according to Mannheim (1991, p. 173):…”

Section: The 2016 Reform: An Exponent Of Unfeasible Utopian Advancementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reforming the Reception and Inclusion of Refugees in the European Union: Utopian or Dystopian Changes?

Spina

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The provision of high‐quality reception conditions and the effective inclusion of refugees are permanent challenges in the implementation of the European asylum agenda. The EU legal framework for the reception of refugees has evolved over time through various legislative reforms, notably including those launched in 2016 and the New Pact on Migration and Asylum proposed in 2020. The European Union has also tried to reinforce its non‐binding integration policy with the adoption of the Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021–2027. While this plan is intended to promote an alternative “social resilient” integration model for refugees that emulates community sponsorship in Europe, it also generates great bottom‐up expectations to provide better integration. These legislative reform proposals and their programmatic framework are theoretically intended to consolidate the European reception and integration system, but in practice have increased the dichotomous tension between utopia and dystopia. Drawing on a political interpretation of both concepts, this article critically analyses the real nature of the changes proposed in the legislative CEAS reforms and in the action plans. Both visions are useful to evaluate the desirability, viability, and achievability of these transformative changes in the future asylum system.

show abstract

Section: The 2016 Reform: An Exponent Of Unfeasible Utopian Advancementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reforming the Reception and Inclusion of Refugees in the European Union: Utopian or Dystopian Changes?

Spina

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Respecto al control de calidad de las condiciones de acogida, el texto enmendado de la reforma de 2016 pendiente de aprobación plantea ciertos claroscuros (Velutti, 2016;Slingerberg, 2021). De un lado, merece una lectura positiva, la aplicación de los indicadores de la Oficina Europea de Apoyo al Asilo (EASO, por sus siglas en inglés), la definición de condiciones materiales (texto propuestas de reforma 2016 y 2020: art.…”

Section: La Acogida Prepandemia: Claroscuros Del Gatopardismo Normati...unclassified

“…Sin embargo, de otro lado, resulta controvertido, al asegurar y controlar el riesgo de fuga permitiendo la asignación de residencia u obligaciones de información cuando el solicitante no tiene derecho a las condiciones de acogida (ibídem: art. 14 a 17), llegando a admitir medidas coercitivas para reducir el derecho a tales condiciones materiales o sustituyendo las prestaciones en metálico por otras en especie (ECRE, 2016;Velutti, 2016). Es un enfoque punitivo que genera una fuerte tensión con el artículo 6 de la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales de la UE (CFUE) tal y como se aprecia en una inminente jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) 16 .…”

Section: La Acogida Prepandemia: Claroscuros Del Gatopardismo Normati...unclassified

Untitled

2021

rcai

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Contested Welfare: Migrant Organizations in Search of Their Role in the German Welfare State

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the role of migrant organizations (MOs) in the welfare state and reflects on the transformation and negotiation processes in the organization of social protection in a society that is increasingly characterized by various forms of cross-border mobility. The article first describes various transformation trends in German social policy by highlighting the activation policy and marketization of social services. This transformation concerns not only the formal (material) forms of social protection and the relationship between migration and social policy, but also the organization of social protection within the German welfare state. By analysing qualitative interviews with representatives of migrant organizations and welfare associations, we then show which roles are ascribed to MOs by other welfare actors in the context of social protection and how the MOs position themselves. We argue that these role ascriptions are part of a negotiation process that goes along with the transformation of the German welfare state. MOs are increasingly addressed in the context of integration policy, while at the same time they are becoming more professional and are claiming a stronger role in formal security services. The discussion of the changing role of MOs in the future organization of the welfare state also sheds light on the question of the successful adaptation of social services to the needs of migrants in general.

show abstract

The revised Reception Conditions Directive and adequate and dignified material reception conditions for those seeking international protection

Abstract: Abstract:The Recast Reception

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Reforming the Reception and Inclusion of Refugees in the European Union: Utopian or Dystopian Changes?

Reforming the Reception and Inclusion of Refugees in the European Union: Utopian or Dystopian Changes?

Untitled

Contested Welfare: Migrant Organizations in Search of Their Role in the German Welfare State

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About