The risk to reconstitution: supply chain risk management for the future of the US Air Force’s organic supply chain

Abstract

Purpose The future retirement of US Air Force (USAF) legacy weapon systems (WSs) removes their associated funding from within the Air Force Working Capital Fund and their parts from its organic supply chain inventory. The trending outsourcing of product support to contracted logistics support and its potential long-term consequences to the USAF government-owned, government-operated, organic supply chain and the reconstitution capabilities it enables in the USAF’s organic industrial base, suggests the need to assess its risks. Although there is an existing body of research into the risks of outsourcing the USAF’s industrial repair, and federal legislation such as Core 50/50 laws enacted to institutionalize its risk management, there is comparatively little research into the outsourcing risks to the long-term viability of the supply chain on which that repair capability is dependent. The aim of this research is to fill that research gap by assessing and modeling those risks. This research concludes by providing several future research directions that may be evaluated to provide more detail. Design/methodology/approach Leveraging a conceptual model derived from research and a multi-criteria analysis framework to assess supply chain risk. Quantifying the predicted impact of retirements on funding and inventories of unique parts. Modeling the potential risk due to WS retirement. Findings Results indicated long term enterprise risks to the Air Force’s supply chain correlated to the retirement of WSs and their associated funding and spare parts inventory. Originality/value This research provides an in-depth evaluation of the USAF’s supply chain to assess the holistic risk of product support outsourcing and its long-term impacts on viability by using resource-based view and contingency theory as theoretical underpinnings. In addition, insights and implications for defense supply chain managers and decision-makers.

Developing a decision model for risks associated with using social media in operation and supply chain management

“…CT holds that the most efficient organizational structural design is one where the "structure fits the contingencies". Accordingly, it is necessary to follow a path from risk identification to strategies to overcome risks for achieving supply chain risk (Loska and Higa, 2020).…”

Swedish public procurement and the defence industry: obstacles and opportunities

“…The susceptibility to disruptions in global supply chains, coupled with the political uncertainty related to outsourcing to low-cost countries, has compelled firms to repatriate previously outsourced production and shift operations to politically more predictable nations (Blackhurst et al, 2011;Stentoft et al, 2015;Hartman et al, 2017;Loska and Higa, 2020;Gao et al, 2022). The Department of Defense (DoD) is actively engaged in efforts to enhance competition and establish domestic defence supply capacity, particularly through small businesses.…”

Mapping the landscape of organizational theories for future research themes in supply chain risk management

“…, 2019; Chaudhuri et al. , 2020; Loska and Higa, 2020; Manhart et al. , 2020; Sabahi and Parast, 2020; Singh and Singh, 2019) were based on more than one theory and aimed to explain phenomena, for example, transaction cost theory with the resource-based view (Zeng and Yen, 2017), or information processing theory with resource dependence theory (Manhart et al.…”