2011
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Bisphosphonates in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms, Side Effects, and the Future

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
0
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 This is partially explained by functional and gene expression differences between MM-MSCs and normal donor (ND)-MSCs. 8,[15][16][17][18] However, mechanisms governing ineffectual MM-MSC osteogenesis remain unclear, and the roles of microRNAs (miRs) in this process are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 This is partially explained by functional and gene expression differences between MM-MSCs and normal donor (ND)-MSCs. 8,[15][16][17][18] However, mechanisms governing ineffectual MM-MSC osteogenesis remain unclear, and the roles of microRNAs (miRs) in this process are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multiple myeloma, most recent consensus guidelines recommend monthly aBP treatment for a period of 2 years (3,4). However, it is unknown whether monthly dosing of aBPs is optimal, as there are consequences of long-term aBP therapy, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical stress fractures (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Bisphosphonate-related ONJ is characterized by bone that is necrotic and exposed, located in the maxillofacial area, and present for at least 8 weeks in a patient with history of bisphosphonate treatment, but no history of prior radiation to that area (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 Despite the initial response, prolonged use of aminobisphosphonates often results in osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical stress fractures. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Although the classical pathways activating osteoclast functions are well known in myeloma bone lesions, testing of novel approaches is hampered by a lack of appropriate preclinical models exhibiting adequate window for disease progression with characteristics of disseminated disease in major bones. Toward advancing and testing a genetically engineered stem cell therapy by a systemic approach, targeting osteolytic pathology in myeloma, we first developed a mouse model using the human myeloma cell lines, overexpressing heparanase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%