1996
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<3086:trollm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Low-Level Moisture Convergence and Ocean Latent Heat Fluxes in the Madden and Julian Oscillation: An Observational Analysis Using ISCCP Data and ECMWF Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lead/lag relationship between the surface convergence and MJO deep convection ( Fig. 10.13 of Wang 2005) has been well documented by observational studies, such as Rui and Wang (1990), Hendon and Salby (1994), Zhang (1996), Jones and Weare (1996), Maloney and Hartmann (1998), Matthews (2000), Seo and Kim (2003), Sperber (2003), and Kiladis et al (2005). The surface frictional mass convergence associated with equatorial Kelvin waves should result in low-level moistening and warming ahead of the convection, while the surface frictional mass divergence associated with equatorial Rossby waves should result in low-level drying and cooling behind and under the convection.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lead/lag relationship between the surface convergence and MJO deep convection ( Fig. 10.13 of Wang 2005) has been well documented by observational studies, such as Rui and Wang (1990), Hendon and Salby (1994), Zhang (1996), Jones and Weare (1996), Maloney and Hartmann (1998), Matthews (2000), Seo and Kim (2003), Sperber (2003), and Kiladis et al (2005). The surface frictional mass convergence associated with equatorial Kelvin waves should result in low-level moistening and warming ahead of the convection, while the surface frictional mass divergence associated with equatorial Rossby waves should result in low-level drying and cooling behind and under the convection.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Studies to date have made the most of the available, yet sparse, radiosonde data (e.g., Hendon and Liebmann 1990;Lin and Johnson 1996;KemballCook and Weare 2001;Kiladis et al 2005), the comprehensive, yet model-dependent, reanalysis products, such as the National Centers for Environmental Prediction-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP-NCAR) reanalysis (Kalnay et al 1996) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (Gibson et al 1997; e.g., Rui and Wang 1990;Hendon and Salby 1994;Jones and Weare 1996;Maloney and Hartmann 1998;Sperber 2003;Seo and Kim 2003;Hsu and Lee 2005;Kiladis et al 2005), and in a few cases vertically resolving satellite data (e.g., Bantzer and Wallace 1996;Myers and Waliser 2003). In general these studies have characterized a number of important properties of the MJO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13g, h), thus inhibiting the formation of robust Pacific basin-wide overturning circulations. Present study reemphasizes the important role of enhanced boundary convergence ahead of MJO convection on its smooth eastward propagation (Wang and Li 1994;Hendon and Salby 1994;Jones and Weare 1996). It is expected that MJO convection in Indian Ocean will emanate a low sea level pressure tongue to its east as a Kelvin-wave response (e.g., the classic schematics of Madden and Julian 1972).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…3) is primarily explained by wind variability. Other studies have also found LHFLX anomalies to be primarily wind driven (Jones and Weare 1996;Maloney and Esbensen 2007;AM08;Grodsky et al 2009;Yokoi et al 2014). Thermodynamic variability, on the other hand, largely opposes or damps the positive relationship between intraseasonal LHFLX anomalies and precipitation anomalies (i.e., Figs.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Lhflx To Wind Vs Air-seamentioning
confidence: 83%