2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4945621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rotation-vibration structure of the SO2 C̃1B2 state explained by a new internal coordinate force field

Abstract: Hamiltonian in the Fermi-system basis, the vibrational characters of all vibrational levels can be determined unambiguously. It is shown that the bending mode cannot be treated separately from the coupled stretching modes, particularly at vibrational energies of more than 2000 cm −1 . Based on our force field, the structure of the Coriolis interactions in theC state of SO 2 is also discussed.We identify the origin of the alternating patterns in the effective C rotational constants of levels in the vibrational … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…force field. 9 The C constants of (0,1,0) and (0,0,1) are, respectively, higher and lower than the observed trends, partly because of a Coriolis interaction that we have not deperturbed, due to the lack of high-J data from (0,0,1) necessary to make a precise determination of the inter- action. (The energy denominator is approximately 165 cm −1 .)…”
Section: F Summary Of Rotational Parameters Derived In This Workmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…force field. 9 The C constants of (0,1,0) and (0,0,1) are, respectively, higher and lower than the observed trends, partly because of a Coriolis interaction that we have not deperturbed, due to the lack of high-J data from (0,0,1) necessary to make a precise determination of the inter- action. (The energy denominator is approximately 165 cm −1 .)…”
Section: F Summary Of Rotational Parameters Derived In This Workmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We obtain the value of ∆ vib from our force field fit, described in Part II of this series. 9 We ignore effects from the interaction of (0,1,1) with (0,2,0) because the energy denominator is large (∼170 cm −1 ) and is not expected to make a significant contribution to the low-lying rotational energy levels that we observe. The resulting fit, given in Table III, to a com- Table S.II of the supplementary material).…”
Section: Rotational Structure and Coriolis Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, earlier spectroscopy by Duchesne and Rosen 16 , Jones and Coon 17 , Brand and coworkers 18,19 , and by Hallin and Merer 20 focussed on the unusual low-lying vibrational structure below the dissociation limit, which was apparently the result of a distortion causing unequal SO bond lengths at the minimum-energy geometry. In the first paper of this series, 21 we report the first direct observations ofC-state levels with b 2 vibrational symmetry (odd quanta of v 3 ), and in the second paper, 22 we report a new force field. This new information provides us with the opportunity to make a more precise characterization of the origins of level staggering than was previously possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%