The Rural Development and Rural Self-Suffiency in Bogor District, West Java Province

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tipologi desa berdasarkan status perkembangan dan kemandirian desa. Status perkembangan desa dibangun dengan 11 indikator dan status kemandirian desa dibangun dengan enam indikator. Penelitian menggunakan data sekunder dari BPS yaitu PODES Tahun 2014 sejumlah 434 desa di Kabupaten Bogor. Data primer digunakan untuk mendukung hasil analisis diambil dengan observasi lapangan pada dua desa perwakilan tipologi II dan IV. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan status perkembangan terdapat 187 desa berstatus desa berkembang dan 247 desa berstatus desa tertinggal. Berdasarkan status kemandirian terdapat 78 desa dan 356 desa tidak mandiri. Berdasarkan status perkembangan dan kemandirian terdapat tiga desa masuk tipologi I (maju dan mandiri), 184 desa tipologi II (maju dan tidak mandiri), 172 desa termasuk tipologi III (tertinggal dan tidak mandiri), dan 75 desa termasuk tipologi IV (tertinggal dan mandiri). Nilai korelasi Spearman sebesar -0,371 dimana terdapat hubungan yang terbalik antara status perkembangan desa dengan status kemandirian desa.Kata kunci : tipologi desa, perkembangan desa, kemandirian desa Abstract: This study aimed at map rural typologies based on the status of development and selfsufficiency of the rurals. Status of rural development was built with 11 indicators and status selfsufficient was built with six indicators. The study used secondary data from BPS, wich was PODES 2014 in 434 villages at Bogor district. Primary data was used to support the analysis results with field observations taken at four village representatives typology. The results showed that 187 villages were categorized as developed rurals and 247 villages as undeveloped rurals. Based on self-sufficient status, there were 78 villages categorized as self-sufficient rurals and 356 villages as unself-sufficient rurals. Based on the status of development and self-sufficient, three villages were categorized as typology I (developed and self-suffient rurals), 184 villages were typology II (developed and unself-suffient rurals), 172 villages were typology III (undeveloped and unself-sufficient rurals), and 75 villages were typology IV (undeveloped and self-sufficient rurals). Spearman correlation value was -0.371, there was an inverse relationship between the development status and self-sufficiency status of the rural.