2022
DOI: 10.1080/02603594.2022.2106977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Samsonov Configurational Model: Instructive Historical Remarks and the Extension of Its Application to Substituted Hydroxyapatite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is exactly what puts the romanticist at perpetual odds with the establishment, which, like the Grand Inquisitor 68 , holds the keys to this very truth, relativist by nature, in its hands. Paralleling the intense emphasis on constructivist, psychological effects in sciences, sociologically inclined philosophers of science of the 1960s and the 1970s, including, most prominently, Thomas Kuhn, were busy pointing out the relativism of truth in science 69 , specifically how what is true and what is not is predominantly determined by the degree of acceptance by the scientific community 70 , a process that favors those who are skilled at bowing to the mob as opposed to the nonconformists who always find themselves at odds with it. However, rather than humanizing natural sciences, the proliferation of these relativistic attitudes has taken the energetic enthusiasm that is romanticist in essence and diluted it in the bland waters of pervasive pliancy and "anything goes" 71 attitudes.…”
Section: Week 7 Year 1930: Ståhlberg Vs Khanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exactly what puts the romanticist at perpetual odds with the establishment, which, like the Grand Inquisitor 68 , holds the keys to this very truth, relativist by nature, in its hands. Paralleling the intense emphasis on constructivist, psychological effects in sciences, sociologically inclined philosophers of science of the 1960s and the 1970s, including, most prominently, Thomas Kuhn, were busy pointing out the relativism of truth in science 69 , specifically how what is true and what is not is predominantly determined by the degree of acceptance by the scientific community 70 , a process that favors those who are skilled at bowing to the mob as opposed to the nonconformists who always find themselves at odds with it. However, rather than humanizing natural sciences, the proliferation of these relativistic attitudes has taken the energetic enthusiasm that is romanticist in essence and diluted it in the bland waters of pervasive pliancy and "anything goes" 71 attitudes.…”
Section: Week 7 Year 1930: Ståhlberg Vs Khanmentioning
confidence: 99%