2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijise.2011.043142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The selection of flexible manufacturing system using preference selection index method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past few decades, a good number of researchers have proposed and applied many decision-making techniques to guide in dealing with the issue of evaluation and selection of advanced manufacturing technologies, like FMS for specific industrial applications. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [6][7][8][9], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [10][11][12][13][14], mixed integer linear programming model [15], intelligent tools and expert systems [16], decision algorithm based on fuzzy set theory [17], TOPSIS [18], fuzzy multi-objective programming [19], axiomatic design method [20], digraph and matrix approach [21], artificial neural network [22], combinatorial mathematics [23], PROMETHEE [24], analytic network process (ANP) [25], preference selection index (PSI) method [26], GRA [27], principal component analysis (PCA) [28] etc methods have been apllied to solve the FMS selection problems. Although, MCDM methods are observed to have immense potential to deal with such complex decision-making problems in conflicting situations, no effort yet been put to show the effet of normalization techniques on the ranking performance of MCDM methods while solving the FMS slection problems in discrete m,anufacturing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, a good number of researchers have proposed and applied many decision-making techniques to guide in dealing with the issue of evaluation and selection of advanced manufacturing technologies, like FMS for specific industrial applications. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [6][7][8][9], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [10][11][12][13][14], mixed integer linear programming model [15], intelligent tools and expert systems [16], decision algorithm based on fuzzy set theory [17], TOPSIS [18], fuzzy multi-objective programming [19], axiomatic design method [20], digraph and matrix approach [21], artificial neural network [22], combinatorial mathematics [23], PROMETHEE [24], analytic network process (ANP) [25], preference selection index (PSI) method [26], GRA [27], principal component analysis (PCA) [28] etc methods have been apllied to solve the FMS selection problems. Although, MCDM methods are observed to have immense potential to deal with such complex decision-making problems in conflicting situations, no effort yet been put to show the effet of normalization techniques on the ranking performance of MCDM methods while solving the FMS slection problems in discrete m,anufacturing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steps involved in PSI methodology are as follows (Maniya and Bhatt, 2010, 2011b, 2013Vahdani et al, 2011;Sawant et al, 2011;Joseph and Sridharan, 2011):…”
Section: Psi Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rao and Singh (2011) used Euclidean distance-based integrated approach (EDBA) to solve the same problem having linguistic terms in the decision matrix. Maniya and Bhatt (2011) solved the same problem using preference selection index method. Karande and Chakraborty (2013) used MACBETH software to select the best FMS.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%