2015
DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2014.980841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The self in family coexistence: developing youth's agency and prosociality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a collectivist culture, Filipinos embed others, particularly their primary caregivers (i.e., family), in settings, situations, or contexts in which their selves are connected (Markus & Kitayama, ; Triandis, ). The interpersonal and communal nature of the Filipino family is a substantial part of a child's definition of self (Reyes & Resurreccion, ). Thus, changes in the structure and function of the family due to parental migration will result in changes to the configuration of the left‐behind child's sense of self.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a collectivist culture, Filipinos embed others, particularly their primary caregivers (i.e., family), in settings, situations, or contexts in which their selves are connected (Markus & Kitayama, ; Triandis, ). The interpersonal and communal nature of the Filipino family is a substantial part of a child's definition of self (Reyes & Resurreccion, ). Thus, changes in the structure and function of the family due to parental migration will result in changes to the configuration of the left‐behind child's sense of self.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filipino terms such as hiya(shame) and utang na loob (debt of gratitude) are also pivotal values in the Filipino culture (Alampay, 2014). In all, Filipino parents are described to be nurturing and supportive (De la Cruz, Protacio, Balanon, Yacat, & Francisco, 2001), and one of the Filipino family's primary and important functions is to educate the children (Reyes& Resurrection, 2015). Filipino parents view education not only as an investment for their children, but also for the whole family (Blair, 2014;Medina, 2001;Ying & Han, 2008).…”
Section: The Filipino Family and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These losses include reduced parent–child communication and bonding (Ryan et al, 2015; Su et al, 2013), lessened parental supervision (Shen et al, 2013; Lei et al, 2019), and stressful caregiving re‐arrangements (Graham & Jordan, 2011). These losses are subjectively amplified given that Filipinos who, like other collectivist‐oriented cultural groups, have been known to place family as central to the construction of their identity (Little et al, 2006; Reyes & Resurreccion, 2015) and treat parents in the most deferential manner (Christ, 2017; Parreñas, 2005). Thus, it could be asserted that any consequent changes in the roles and function within the family and the losses experienced by LBC (with collectivist cultural orientation) due to parental migration will be felt more as they would substantially redefine the way they construe their “self” in relation to others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%