2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017ms001241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sensitivity of Numerical Simulations of Cloud‐Topped Boundary Layers to Cross‐Grid Flow

Abstract: In mesoscale and global atmospheric simulations with large horizontal domains, strong horizontal flow across the grid is often unavoidable, but its effects on cloud‐topped boundary layers have received comparatively little study. Here the effects of cross‐grid flow on large‐eddy simulations of stratocumulus and trade‐cumulus marine boundary layers are studied across a range of grid resolutions (horizontal × vertical) between 500 m × 20 m and 35 m × 5 m. Three cases are simulated: DYCOMS nocturnal stratocumulus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a second-order scheme in the horizontal further increased the differences among the shear cases (in particular under free surface fluxes), which we attribute to the fact that the second-order scheme accumulates a lot of energy on the smallest length scales close to the grid size. To reduce horizontal advective errors and allow for a larger time step, the grid was horizontally translated using a velocity that is equal to the imposed wind at 3 km height (Galilean transform; see, e.g., Wyant et al, 2018).…”
Section: Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a second-order scheme in the horizontal further increased the differences among the shear cases (in particular under free surface fluxes), which we attribute to the fact that the second-order scheme accumulates a lot of energy on the smallest length scales close to the grid size. To reduce horizontal advective errors and allow for a larger time step, the grid was horizontally translated using a velocity that is equal to the imposed wind at 3 km height (Galilean transform; see, e.g., Wyant et al, 2018).…”
Section: Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-2). To determine whether sensitivities to cross-grid flow like those highlighted by Wyant et al (2018) have compared various runs with a fixed and a translating grid (at the approximate average speed of the cloud-layer flow).…”
Section: Les Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a second‐order scheme in the horizontal further increased the differences among the shear cases (in particular under free surface fluxes), which we attribute to the fact that the second‐order scheme accumulates a lot of energy on the smallest length scales close to the grid size. To reduce horizontal advective errors and allow for a larger time step, the grid was horizontally translated using a velocity that is equal to the imposed wind at 3 km height (Galilean transform; see, e.g., Wyant et al, 2018).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%