1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80295-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SFA system for assessing articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy of the knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of meniscal injury and the appearance of the anterior cruciate ligaments and articular cartilage were recorded. The French Arthroscopic Society system [22][23][24] was used for assessing lesions of the articular cartilage. Five grades were recorded; grade 0 (normal), grade I (swelling and softening), grade II (superficial fibrillation), grade III (deep fibrillation), and grade IV (exposure of subchondral bone).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of meniscal injury and the appearance of the anterior cruciate ligaments and articular cartilage were recorded. The French Arthroscopic Society system [22][23][24] was used for assessing lesions of the articular cartilage. Five grades were recorded; grade 0 (normal), grade I (swelling and softening), grade II (superficial fibrillation), grade III (deep fibrillation), and grade IV (exposure of subchondral bone).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…less affected cartilage (LA-cartilage; Grade 0-1) and severely affected cartilage (SA-cartilage; Grade 2-3). The grading was performed based on the methods proposed by Dougados et al (1994). This assessment is either a continuous variable (scoring) or a semiquantitative variable (grading) related to the three key features of cartilage damage: localization, depth, and surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 New classification systems focus mainly on objective parameters, such as lesion depth and extent, and less on surface/superficial properties. 14,17,22,23 Although the modified Outerbridge classification 15 is widely accepted for arthroscopic grading of cartilage lesions, in the cadaver study of Cameron et al, 24 it demonstrated only moderate validity, depending on the localization and severity of the lesions. 15,25 Precise data on a lesion's characteristics, such as location, depth and surface area, as well as the status of the contiguous cartilage, are essential for both diagnosis and optimal treatment choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%