The short-term effectiveness of real-time video counselling on smoking cessation among residents in rural and remote areas: An interim analysis of a randomised trial

Byaruhanga, Judith; Paul, Christine; Wiggers, John; Byrnes, Emma; Mitchell, Aimee; Lecathelinais, Christophe; Bowman, Jenny; Campbell, Elizabeth; Gillham, Karen; Tzelepis, Flora

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108448

Cited by 14 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After reviewing the full text, 2848 studies were excluded with 135 remaining. Premised on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 101 of studies were excluded, and finally, 34 studies were included in our study 28–61 . The research flow chart is shown in Figure 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Premised on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 101 of studies were excluded, and finally, 34 studies were included in our study. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 The research flow chart is shown in Figure 1 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Li,

Gao,

Chao

et al. 2024

Addiction Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A network meta‐analysis (NMA) including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the effects of different interventions on smoking cessation. Studies were collected from online databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies were further examined in the NMA to compare the effect of 14 interventions on smoking cessation. Thirty‐four studies were examined in the NMA, including a total of 14 interventions and 28 733 participants. The results showed that health education (HE; odds ratio ([OR] = 200.29, 95% CI [1.62, 24 794.61])), other interventions (OI; OR = 29.79, 95% CI [1.07, 882.17]) and multimodal interventions (MUIs; OR = 100.16, 95% CI [2.06, 4867.24]) were better than self‐help material (SHM). HE (OR = 243.31, 95% CI [1.39, 42531.33]), MUI (OR = 121.67, 95% CI [1.64, 9004.86]) and financial incentive (FI; OR = 14.09, 95% CI [1.21, 164.31]) had positive effects on smoking cessation rate than smoking cessation or quitting APP (QA). Ranking results showed that HE (83.6%) and motivation interviewing (MI; 69.6%) had better short‐term effects on smoking cessation. HE and MUI provided more smoking cessation benefits than SHM and QA. FI was more effective at quitting smoking than QA. Also, HE and MI were more likely to be optimal smoking cessation interventions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Li,

Gao,

Chao

et al. 2024

Addiction Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Delivering counseling using video call–based visits is a relatively newer method that expanded amid broader health system changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic . The effectiveness of video virtual visits compared with in-person counseling is not known, but limited evidence based on preliminary randomized trials suggests that video visits are no less effective than telephone counselling …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Tobacco Smoking

Rigotti

Kruse

Livingstone‐Banks

et al. 2022

JAMA

176

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ore than an estimated 8 million smoking-attributed deaths occur globally each year, and approximately 34 million people in the US (14% of adults) currently smoke cigarettes. 1,2 One-third to one-half of people who regularly smoke cigarettes die of a tobacco-related disease, typically approximately 10 years earlier than people who do not smoke cigarettes. 3 Most smoking-attributed deaths are due to cancer (34%), cardiovascular diseases (32%), or respiratory disease (21%). 3 Smoking is associated with cancers of the lung, oropharynx, larynx, esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, kidney, bladder, uterine cervix, and colon or rectum, as well as acute myeloid leukemia. 3 Nearly 90% of lung cancers are attributed to cigarette smoking. 3 Smoking is responsible for approximately 80% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease deaths. 3 The health risk from cigarette smoking is primarily due to chemicals produced by the burning of tobacco and not to nicotine. 3 More than 80% of tobacco users in the US use combustible products, primarily cigarettes but also cigars, pipes, and waterpipes (hookah). 2 In 2019, 19% of US tobacco users reported using multiple tobacco products. 2 Disproportionately high rates of smoking occur among adults with lower education, lower incomes, nontobacco substance use disorders, psychiatric conditions, people living with HIV, American Indian or Alaska Native individuals, and members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT+) community. 2,4 Black individuals experience higher rates of tobacco-related disease and death than any other race. Black men have the highest lung cancer death rate of any racial or ethnic group at 60.4 per 100 000, despite having similar smoking rates as White individuals. 2,5 Worldwide, an estimated 1.3 billion individuals use tobacco products, and more than 80% of them live in low-and middle-income countries. 1 In the US, nearly 90% of adult daily smokers started IMPORTANCE More deaths in the US are attributed to cigarette smoking each year than to any other preventable cause. Approximately 34 million people and an estimated 14% of adults in the US smoke cigarettes. If they stopped smoking, they could reduce their risk of tobacco-related morbidity and mortality and potentially gain up to 10 years of life.OBSERVATIONS Tobacco smoking is a chronic disorder maintained by physical nicotine dependence and learned behaviors. Approximately 70% of people who smoke cigarettes want to quit smoking. However, individuals who attempt to quit smoking make an average of approximately 6 quit attempts before achieving long-term abstinence. Both behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy while using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products, varenicline, or bupropion are effective treatments when used individually, but they are most effective when combined. In a meta-analysis including 19 488 people who smoked cigarettes, the combination of medication and behavioral counseling was associated with a quit rate of 15.2% over 6 months compared with a quit rate of 8.6% with brief advice or u...

show abstract

“…Literature indicates that telephone support increases the chances of stopping smoking, whether the individuals are motivated to quit or not, or if they are receiving other support 37 . The COM-B model supports remote smoking cessation treatment as this approach may provide the opportunity to access support by removing barriers (e.g., travel and cost), particularly for those where accessing face-to-face services may be challenging 38,39 . Text messaging is also an established cessation modality 40 and has shown to promote smoking cessation in the short-term 41 and long-term 42 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 36 The COM-B model supports remote smoking cessation treatment as this approach may provide the opportunity to access support by removing barriers (e.g., travel and cost), particularly for those where accessing face-to-face services may be challenging. 37 , 38 Text messaging is also an established cessation modality 39 and has been shown to promote smoking cessation in the short term 40 and long term. 41 The opportunity for a remote peer interaction group was selected as a component to replace the identification of a support “buddy.” There is strong evidence to suggest that social networks play an important role in an individual’s quit attempt, 42 , 43 and we found all “social support” BCTs were identified as “promising” both in terms of likely effectiveness and feasibility.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting and Maintaining Changes in Smoking Behavior for Patients Following Discharge from a Smoke-free Mental Health Inpatient Stay: Development of a Complex Intervention Using the Behavior Change Wheel

Shoesmith

Huddlestone

Pervin

et al. 2022

Nicotine &Amp; Tobacco Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aims Evidence suggests that smokers can successfully quit, remain abstinent or reduce smoking during a smokefree mental health inpatient stay, provided behavioural/pharmacological support are offered. However, few evidence-based strategies to prevent the return to pre-hospital smoking behaviours post-discharge exist. We report the development of an intervention designed to support smoking-related behaviour change following discharge from a smokefree mental health stay. Method We followed the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) intervention development process. The target behaviour was supporting patients to change their smoking behaviours following discharge from a smokefree mental health stay. Using systematic reviews, we identified the barriers/enablers, classified according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Potential intervention functions to address key influences were identified by consulting the BCW and Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) taxonomy. Another systematic review identified effectiveness of BCTs in this context. Stakeholder consultations were conducted to prioritise/refine intervention content. Results Barriers/enablers to supporting smoking cessation were identified within the domains of environmental context and resources (lack of staff time); knowledge (ill-informed interactions about smoking); social influences, and intentions (lack of intention to deliver support). Potential strategies to address these influences included goal setting, problem solving, feedback, social support, and information on health consequences. A strategy for operationalising these techniques into intervention components was agreed: pre-discharge evaluation sessions, personalised resource folder, tailored behavioural and text message support post-discharge, and a peer interaction group, delivered by a trained mental health worker. Conclusions The intervention includes targeted resources to support smoking-related behaviour change in patients following discharge from a smokefree mental health setting. Implications Using the BCW and TDF supported a theoretically and empirically informed process to define and develop a tailored intervention that acknowledges barriers and enablers to supporting smoking cessation in mental health settings. The result is a novel complex theory- and evidence-based intervention that will be formally tested in a randomised controlled feasibility study.

show abstract

The short-term effectiveness of real-time video counselling on smoking cessation among residents in rural and remote areas: An interim analysis of a randomised trial

Cited by 14 publications

References 23 publications

Effects of interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Effects of interventions on smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Treatment of Tobacco Smoking

Promoting and Maintaining Changes in Smoking Behavior for Patients Following Discharge from a Smoke-free Mental Health Inpatient Stay: Development of a Complex Intervention Using the Behavior Change Wheel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About